The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Precision livestock farming technologies for welfare management in intensive livestock systems: -EN- Precision livestock farming technologies for welfare management in intensive livestock systems -FR- Les technologies de l’élevage de précision appliquées à la gestion du bien-être animal dans les systèmes d’élevage intensif -ES- Tecnologías de ganadería de precisión para la gestión del bienestar en sistemas de ganadería intensiva
Abstract
The worldwide demand for meat and animal products is expected to increase by at least 40% in the next 15 years. The first question is how to achieve high-quality, sustainable and safe meat production that can meet this demand. At the same time, livestock production is currently facing serious problems. Concerns about animal health in relation to food safety and human health are increasing. The European Union wants improved animal welfare and has made a significant investment in it. At the same time, the environmental impact of the livestock sector is a major issue. Finally, it is necessary to ask how the farmer, who is the central figure in this process, will make a living from more sustainable livestock production systems. One tool that might provide real opportunities is precision livestock farming (PLF). In contrast to previous approaches, PLF systems aim to offer a real-time monitoring and management system that focuses on improving the life of the animals by warning when problems arise so that the farmer may take immediate action. Continuous, fully automatic monitoring and improvement of animal health and welfare, product yields and environmental impacts should become possible. This paper presents examples of systems that have already been developed in order to demonstrate the potential benefits of this technology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Precision farming at the nexus of agricultural production and the environment
Finger, R., Swinton, S. M., El Benni, N., & Walter, A. (2019) · Annual Review of Resource Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-resource-100518-093929 · Cited by 539
Precision Agriculture for Crop and Livestock Farming—Brief Review
Monteiro, A., Santos, S., & Gonçalves, P. (2021) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani11082345 · Cited by 396
A systematic literature review on the use of machine learning in precision livestock farming
García, R., Aguilar, J., Toro, M., Pinto, A., & Rodríguez, P. (2020) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2020.105826 · Cited by 292
Animal welfare and efficient farming: is conflict inevitable?
Dawkins, M. S. (2017) · Animal Production Science · doi:10.1071/an15383 · Cited by 257
Predictive Modeling of Bovine Respiratory Disease Outcomes in Feedlot Cattle: A Narrative Review
Wisnieski, L., Amrine, D. E., & Renter, D. G. (2021) · Livestock Science · doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104666 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- BERCKMANS, D.
- Venue
- Revue Scientifique et Technique de l'OIE
- Published
- 2014-04-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 189-196
- ISSN
- 0253-1933 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2189495940
- Cited by
- 431
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Precision livestock farming technologies for welfare management in intensive livestock systems: -EN- Precision livestock farming technologies for welfare management in intensive livestock systems -FR- Les technologies de l’élevage de précision appliquées à la gestion du bien-être animal dans les systèmes d’élevage intensif -ES- Tecnologías de ganadería de precisión para la gestión del bienestar en sistemas de ganadería intensiva. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.20506/rst.33.1.2273
- The paper
- BERCKMANS, D. (2014). Precision livestock farming technologies for welfare management in intensive livestock systems: -EN- Precision livestock farming technologies for welfare management in intensive livestock systems -FR- Les technologies de l’élevage de précision appliquées à la gestion du bien-être animal dans les systèmes d’élevage intensif -ES- Tecnologías de ganadería de precisión para la gestión del bienestar en sistemas de ganadería intensiva. Revue Scientifique et Technique de l'OIE. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.33.1.2273
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.