Cited by 539Smart Agriculture and AIRemote Sensing in AgricultureAgricultural Innovations and Practices

Precision farming at the nexus of agricultural production and the environment

Open access
Finger, Robert, Swinton, Scott M., El Benni, Nadja, Walter, Achim·2019·Annual Review of Resource Economics

Abstract

Precision farming enables agricultural management decisions to be tailored spatially and temporally. Site-specific sensing, sampling, and managing allow farmers to treat a field as a heterogeneous entity. Through targeted use of inputs, precision farming reduces waste, thereby cutting both private variable costs and the environmental costs such as those of agrichemical residuals. At present, large farms in developed countries are the main adopters of precision farming. But its potential environmental benefits can justify greater public and private sector incentives to encourage adoption, including in small-scale farming systems in developing countries. Technological developments and big data advances continue to make precision farming tools more connected, accurate, efficient, and widely applicable. Improvements in the technical infrastructure and the legal framework can expand access to precision farming and thereby its overall societal benefits.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-resource-100518-093929

Cites

121 of 121 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Such efficiency gains could happen through data-driven temporal and site-specific farm management, reduced waste, and the use of autonomous seeding or weed control.

    “Such efficiency gains could happen through data-driven temporal and site-specific farm management, reduced waste, and the use of autonomous seeding or weed control, just to mention a few [104].”

    From Artificial intelligence, systemic risks, and sustainability (2021) · cites this paper as [104]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Bouroubi Y, Bugnet P, Nguyen-Xuan T, Gosselin C, Bélec C, et al. 2018. Pest detection on UAV imagery using a deep convolutional neural network. Paper presented at the 14th International Conference on Precision Agriculture, Monticello, IL
  2. Chi H, Welch S, Vasserman E, Kalaimannan E. 2017. A framework of cybersecurity approaches in precision agriculture. In Proceedings of the ICMLG2017 5th International Conference on Management Leadership and Governance, pp. 90-95. Reading, UK: Acad. Conf. Publ. Int.
  3. Gnyp ML, Panitzki M, Reusch S, Jasper J, Bolten A, Bareth G. 2016. Comparison between tractor-based and UAV- based spectrometer measurements in winter wheat. Paper presented at the 13th International Conference on Precision Agriculture, St. Louis, MO
  4. Golka W, Żurek G, Kami ński JR. 2016. Permanent grassland restoration techniques-an overview. Agric. Eng. 20(4):51-58
  5. Isik M, Khanna M. 2002. Variable-rate nitrogen application under uncertainty: implications for profitability and nitrogen use. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 27(1):61-76
  6. Khosla R, Fleming K, Delgado JA, Shaver TM, Westfall DG. 2002. Use of site-specific management zones to improve nitrogen management for precision agriculture. J. Soil Water Conserv. 57(6):513-18
  7. Lilienthal H, Gerighausen H, Schnug E. 2018. Agricultural remote sensing information for farmers in Germany. Paper presented at the 14th International Conference on Precision Agriculture, Monticello, IL
  8. Lowenberg-DeBoer J. 2015. The precision agriculture revolution: making the modern farmer. Foreign Aff. 94(3):105-12
  9. Sadler EJ, Evans R, Stone KC, Camp CR. 2005. Opportunities for conservation with precision irrigation. J. Soil Water Conserv. 60(6):371-78
  10. Schimmelpfennig D, Ebel R. 2016. Sequential adoption and cost savings from precision agriculture. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 41(1):97-115
  11. Tamirat TW, Pedersen SM, Lind KM. 2018. Farm and operator characteristics affecting adoption of precision agriculture in Denmark and Germany. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. B Soil Plant Sci. 68(4):349-57
  12. Tian F. 2016. An agri-food supply chain traceability system for China based on RFID & blockchain technology. Paper presented at the 13th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management, Kunming, China
  13. Xiongkui H, Bonds J, Herbst A, Langenakens J. 2017. Recent development of unmanned aerial vehicle for plant protection in East Asia. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 10(3):18-30
  14. Zhou XV, English BC, Larson JA, Lambert DM, Roberts RK, et al. 2017. Precision farming adoption trends in the southern US. J. Cotton Sci. 21(2):143-55

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Finger, R., Swinton, S. M., El Benni, N., & Walter, A.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • Research Division on Competitiveness and System Evaluation, Agroscope, 8356 Ettenhausen, Switzerland;
Venue
Annual Review of Resource Economics
Published
2019-10-05
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
313-335
ISSN
  • 1941-1340 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-1359
OpenAlex
W2942230041
Cited by
539
References
121
Citations by year
2026: 102 · 2025: 93 · 2024: 101 · 2023: 74 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 8
FWCI
3.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Resource Economics (publishedVersion)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection
Funders
National Science Foundation (1027253)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Smart Agriculture and AI
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Remote Sensing in Agriculture
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Keywords
precision agriculture, site-specific management, agricultural inputs, environmental costs of agriculture, smallholder farming, technology adoption incentives, big data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review