Cited by 17Indigenous Health, Education, and RightsIndigenous and Place-Based EducationMigration, Education, Indigenous Social Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Indigenous Education in Comparative Perspective: Global Opportunities for Reimagining Schools

Open access
Cottrell, Michael·2010·International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education

Abstract

Despite the striking parallels in the educational experiences of Indigenous peoples in Canada, the United States, Australia and New Zealand, very little research of an explicitly comparative nature has actually been conducted.These modern states are all are products of European colonizing projects which marginalized Indigenous peoples, and currently members of Indigenous groups are among the most disadvantaged in terms of educational outcomes in all four jurisdictions.Closing the educational achievement gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous learners is, consequently, a shared and urgent policy priority.While the uniqueness and diversity of Indigenous groups militate against any simple application of global solutions to local circumstances, each country has much to learn from initiatives, both successful and unsuccessful, which have been developed in other jurisdictions.From a macro-analytical level it appears that educators in all four jurisdictions are moving away from deficit approaches and embracing cultural congruence and evidence based-practice as theoretical underpinnings for educational policy with respect to Indigenous students.Recent national, state and provincial-level initiatives have typically been informed by cultural congruence theory, by the School Effectiveness and School Improvement movements and by insights from research around "schools in challenging circumstances".The discourse of post-colonialism is exerting an increasingly powerful influence on educational policy in all four countries and serves as a strategy of state legitimation by liberal democracies to foster social cohesion.In all four jurisdictions publiclyfunded schools are seen as the institutions with the greatest capacity to foster shared understanding and respect among different cultural groups and remain possibly the best hope for forging harmonious and prosperous futures in these increasingly diverse and globalized societies.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.20533/ijcdse.2042.6364.2010.0031

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 17

Metadata

Authors
Cottrell, M.
Affiliations
University of Saskatchewan (CA)
Corresponding author
Cottrell, Michael
Venue
International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education
Published
2010-12-01
Volume
1
Issue
4
Pages
223-227
ISSN
2042-6364 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2470453711
Cited by
17
References
30
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Social Sciences › Education › Indigenous and Place-Based Education
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Migration, Education, Indigenous Social Dynamics
Keywords
indigenous education, comparative education, educational achievement gap, deficit approach, cultural congruence, evidence-based practice, postcolonialism, education policy, school effectiveness, colonialism, Canada, United States, Australia, New Zealand

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review