Form Follows Availability – Designing Structures Through Reuse
Open accessAbstract
This work proposes a new direction in structural design: the synthesis of structures through the reuse of elements. Reusing structural elements reduces the environmental impacts of building structures because it avoids sourcing new material, it reduces waste and it requires little energy. Designing structures from reused elements is unlike conventional structural design because stock element availability is a design input. In other words, structures must be designed subject to availability of given element characteristics such as length and cross-section type, which have a major influence on the optimal structure layout and form. In this new paradigm structural form follows availability. In this work new computational methods for the synthesis of reticular structures through reuse are formulated to address two scenarios: a) reuse of reclaimed elements from a given stock, and b) design of an element stock which is used as a kit of parts to build diverse structures. Case studies are presented to demonstrate the potential of the proposed methods. It is shown that structures produced by these methods have a significantly lower environmental impact than minimum weight structures made of new elements.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Algorithmic approaches have been proposed to address the geometric challenges of designing with an inventory of nonstandard materials.
“Algorithmic approaches have been proposed to address the geometric challenges of designing with an inventory of nonstandard materials (Brütting, Senatore, and Fivet 2019;Brütting et al. 2019;Huang et al. 2021;T. Cousin et al. 2023).”
From A digital circularity approach to leverage waste lumber in dowel-laminated timber slabs (2025) · cites this paper as Brütting et al. 2019
Algorithmic approaches have been proposed to address the geometric challenges of designing with an inventory of nonstandard materials.
“Algorithmic approaches have been proposed to address the geometric challenges of designing with an inventory of nonstandard materials (Brütting, Senatore, and Fivet 2019;Brütting et al. 2019;Huang et al. 2021;T. Cousin et al. 2023).”
From A digital circularity approach to leverage waste lumber in dowel-laminated timber slabs (2025) · cites this paper as Brütting, Senatore, and Fivet 2019
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A digital circularity approach to leverage waste lumber in dowel-laminated timber slabs
Blowes, R. M., Lee, K. J., Mayencourt, P., Kennedy, S., & Mueller, C. (2025) · Structures and Architecture · doi:10.1201/9781003658641-8 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Brütting, J., Senatore, G., & Fivet, C.
- Affiliations
- École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Brütting, Jan
- Venue
- Journal of the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures
- Published
- 2019-12-01
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 257-265
- ISSN
- 1028-365X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2991077592
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 1.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- infoscience.epfl.ch
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Journal of the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures (publishedVersion)
- Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Analysis and Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Topology Optimization in Engineering
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Architecture › Architecture and Computational Design
- Keywords
- reticular structures, structural synthesis, element availability, kit of parts, environmental impact of buildings, waste reduction, structural layout optimization, spatial structure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review