Cited by 1Wood Treatment and PropertiesOptimization and Packing ProblemsArchitecture and Computational Design

A digital circularity approach to leverage waste lumber in dowel-laminated timber slabs

Open access
Blowes, R.M., Lee, K.J., Mayencourt, P., Kennedy, S., Mueller, C.·2025·Structures and Architecture

Abstract

Given the substantial carbon impact of buildings, structural systems which are low in embodied carbon are needed to address climate change. The use of salvaged materials for structural applications presents the opportunity to divert construction and demolition waste while reducing the embodied carbon of new structural components. This paper proposes a typology for dowel-laminated timber (DLT) slabs built up from waste lumber offcuts. A mechanical model for the DLT system composed of geometrically heterogeneous offcuts is developed. A workflow which leverages algorithmic methods for inventory assignment and structural optimization to design slabs which meet deflection requirements is introduced.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This paper proposes a dowel-laminated timber (DLT) slab typology built from waste lumber offcuts, with a mechanical model and algorithmic workflow for inventory assignment and shape optimization. The workflow produced slab designs meeting an L/240 deflection limit, including sampled spans up to 6.00 m.

Key findings

  • For a 3 m span and a synthetic inventory of 500 offcuts ranging from 0.1 m to 2.5 m in length and 2x4 to 2x12 in cross section, all shown designs met the deflection limit of L/240; some had lower maximum displacement than a continuous DLT reference slab.
  • Optimization reduced trimming and processing: regular-interval designs A and B met deflection with comparable matching costs but required more trimming, while optimized designs C–F tended to use fewer 2x6 boards.
  • Sampling the alternating-board parameterization found feasible designs across spans from 3.00 m to 6.00 m; for dowel spacings of 0.10 m and 0.20 m, feasible designs occurred for average board lengths between 0.06 m and 0.20 m, and spans reached the maximum tested value of 6.00 m with appropriate dowel spacing.
  • Dowel spacing appeared to have an important role in structural performance and should be examined further.

Methods

  • The study developed a mechanical model and finite element analysis (FEA) in Karamba/Grasshopper for a 10-lamination, one-way bending DLT slab, using pin and roller supports, a total load of 0.18 kN/m per lamination, 2 cm diameter dowels, and assumed SPF No.2 wood properties.
  • The design space was parametrized using three approaches: regularly spaced divisions alternating between laminations, a single control surface, and two control surfaces; the Hungarian matching algorithm via the Digital Circularity Toolkit assigned inventory to the parametrized geometry, with penalties for curves under 1.5 inches or fewer than two dowels per board.
  • A constrained optimization using COBYLA/Radical minimized matching cost subject to a deflection limit of Δmax = L/240, and the design space was sampled for spans from 3.00 m to 6.00 m with dowel spacings of 0.10 m and 0.20 m.

Limitations

  • The paper states that future research should include fabrication and testing of physical DLT slab prototypes to understand how closely their behavior matches the mechanical model, broader inventory management and supply chain analysis, consideration of structural weight for comparison, and further examination of dowel spacing.
  • Evident from the text: the analysis uses a synthetic inventory and assumed SPF No.2 material properties rather than a real waste lumber supply, and the results are based on FEA and optimization without experimental validation.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1201/9781003658641-8

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

14 of 26 cited sources checked · 13 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Several studies have shown the potential of including reclaimed wood in cross-laminated timber (CLT) and dowel-laminated timber (DLT) products.

    “Several studies have shown the potential of including reclaimed wood in these products, such as cross-laminated timber (CLT) (Arbelaez, Schimleck, and Sinha 2020;Llana et al. 2022) and dowel-laminated timber DOI: 10.1201/9781003658641-8 (DLT) (Giordano, Derikvand, and Fink 2023).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Arbelaez, Schimleck, and Sinha 2020 source
    • cites Llana et al. 2022 source
    • cites Giordano, Derikvand, and Fink 2023 source
  • Premisecitation

    The development of engineered mass timber products which incorporate salvaged wood demonstrates the potential of repurposing construction waste for new structural uses.

    “The development of engineered mass timber products which incorporate salvaged wood demonstrates the potential of repurposing construction waste for new structural uses (Arbelaez, Schimleck, and Sinha 2020;Giordano, Derikvand, and Fink 2023;Llana et al. 2022;Rose et al. 2018;Asa et al. 2024).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Arbelaez, Schimleck, and Sinha 2020 source
    • cites Giordano, Derikvand, and Fink 2023 source
    • cites Llana et al. 2022 source
  • Premisecitation

    Algorithmic approaches have been developed to match irregular inventory geometries to target designs for structural applications.

    “Algorithmic approaches have been developed to match irregular inventory geometries to target designs for structural applications (Huang et al. 2021;T. Cousin et al. 2023;Amtsberg et al. 2020;Brütting et al. 2019).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Huang et al. 2021 source

      Section 2.1 describes algorithmically matching inventory elements to a target structural design by geometric fit and structural capacity. Sections 3.1 and 4.1 show that this paper’s method matches reused linear timber members of varying lengths and cross sections; it does not demonstrate matching irregularly shaped elements, so the claim’s reference to irregular geometries is broader than the paper’s own method. (LLM, conf=0.81)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites T. Cousin et al. 2023

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Amtsberg et al. 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Findingreasoning

    For designs A and B, more trimming is required for the offcuts to meet the regular intervals of the discretization.

    “However, for designs A and B, more trimming is required for the offcuts to meet the regular intervals of the discretization.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    Designs C-F tend to incorporate fewer 2x6 boards than designs A and B.

    “These designs, C -F, tend to incorporate fewer 2x6 boards than designs A and B.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 12
  • May combine two claims. 4
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Giordano et al. develop a strategy for combining short salvaged timber boards with new timber in DLT assemblies which does not require end-to-end joining.

    “Giordano et al. develop a strategy for combining short salvaged timber boards with new timber in DLT assemblies which does not require endto-end joining (Giordano, Derikvand, and Fink 2023).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Giordano, Derikvand, and Fink 2023 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Several studies explore the reuse of lumber sourced from deconstruction and recovered timber in CLT structural elements.

    “Several studies explore the reuse of lumber sourced from deconstruction and recovered timber in CLT structural elements (Arbelaez, Schimleck, and Sinha 2020;Rose et al. 2018;Llana et al. 2022).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Arbelaez, Schimleck, and Sinha 2020 source
    • cites Rose et al. 2018 source
    • cites Llana et al. 2022 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Algorithmic approaches have been proposed to address the geometric challenges of designing with an inventory of nonstandard materials.

    “Algorithmic approaches have been proposed to address the geometric challenges of designing with an inventory of nonstandard materials (Brütting, Senatore, and Fivet 2019;Brütting et al. 2019;Huang et al. 2021;T. Cousin et al. 2023).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Brütting, Senatore, and Fivet 2019 source
    • cites Brütting et al. 2019 source
    • cites Huang et al. 2021 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    DLT is particularly beneficial because it does not require adhesives or metal fasteners, contributing to its circularity.

    “DLT is particularly beneficial since it does not require adhesives or metal fasteners, contributing to its circularity (Han et al. 2023).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Han et al. 2023 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Algorithmic methods have been used to reduce required material quantities through the optimization of structural form.

    “Algorithmic methods have also been used to facilitate another approach for limiting embodied carbon in buildings: reducing required material quantities through the optimization of structural form (Mayencourt and Mueller 2020;Ismail, Mayencourt, and Mueller 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Mayencourt and Mueller 2020 source
    • cites Ismail, Mayencourt, and Mueller 2021 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Designs A and B result in geometries which meet the deflection requirement and with matching costs comparable to those found through optimization.

    “These designs result in geometries which meet the deflection requirement and with matching costs comparable to those found through optimization.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingown data

    Figure 4 shows feasible designs which meet the deflection limit found by sampling the design space for the alternating board parametrization across a range of spans from 3.00 m to 6.00 m with varying levels of discretization.

    “Figure 4 shows feasible designs which meet the deflection limit found by sampling the design space for the alternating board parametrization across a range of spans from 3.00 m to 6.00 m with varying levels of discretization.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Applications of this workflow include designing with irregular wood inventories, such as tree forks.

    “Applications of this workflow include designing with irregular wood inventories, such as tree forks (Amtsberg et al. 2020;Tim Cousin et al. 2023).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Amtsberg et al. 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Tim Cousin et al. 2023

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Cousin et al. demonstrate a workflow for implementing the Hungarian matching algorithm to facilitate automated inventory assignment.

    “Cousin et al. demonstrate a workflow for implementing the Hungarian matching algorithm to facilitate automated inventory assignment (T.Cousin et al. 2023).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites T. Cousin et al. 2023

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The development of an additive approach for manufacturing optimized structural forms, which makes use of the full cross section of dimensional lumber, could address the concern that subtractive methods disrupt wood fiber continuity.

    “The development of an additive approach for manufacturing these forms, which makes use of the full cross section of dimensional lumber, could address this concern.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The subtractive manufacturing methods required to produce optimized structural forms can disrupt the continuity of wood fibers.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Computational implementations of the structural optimization of mass timber beams show how the geometry of wood components can be shaped to match structural demands.

    “Computational implementations of the structural optimization of mass timber beams show how the geometry of wood components can be shaped to match structural demands (Mayencourt and Mueller 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mayencourt and Mueller 2020 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Prior studies establish the structural feasibility of designing engineered wood products with salvaged materials but do not explore how computational tools can facilitate the geometric assembly of components or inform their structural design.

    “While these studies establish the structural feasibility of designing engineered wood products with salvaged materials, they do not explore how computational tools can facilitate the geometric assembly of components or inform their structural design.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationcitation

    This workflow is appropriate for automating the geometric matching of lumber offcuts in a composite slab structure.

    “This workflow is appropriate for automating the geometric matching of lumber offcuts in a composite slab structure.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The behavior of a 10-lamination DLT slab configuration is representative of a full slab because it is a one-way bending system.

    “The behavior of this 10-lamination configuration is representative of a full slab since it is a one-way bending system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The use or reuse of salvaged materials for structural applications is a growing research area.

    “However, the use or reuse of salvaged materials for structural applications is a growing research area (Gorgolewski 2017;De Wolf, Çetin, and Bocken 2024;Bergsagel and Heisel 2023;Brütting, Senatore, and Fivet 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Gorgolewski 2017 source
    • cites De Wolf, Çetin, and Bocken 2024

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Bergsagel and Heisel 2023 source
15 of 15
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Offcuts originate from a material supply with known mechanical properties.

    “Since offcuts originate from a material supply with known mechanical properties, geometric heterogeneity is the main design challenge in this case.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Substituting full-length boards for offcuts of varied lengths without employing end-to-end joining poses a structural challenge.

    “Substituting full-length boards for offcuts of varied lengths without employing end-to-end joining poses a structural challenge.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The conventional structural rehabilitation practice of sistering joists demonstrates that adjacent structural members connected laterally are capable of sharing loads without full-length continuity.

    “The conventional structural rehabilitation practice of sistering joists demonstrates that adjacent structural members connected laterally are capable of sharing loads without full-length continuity.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The subtractive manufacturing methods required to produce optimized structural forms can disrupt the continuity of wood fibers.

    “However, the subtractive manufacturing methods required to produce these optimized structural forms can disrupt the continuity of wood fibers.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Currently, the use of salvaged wood structural components often involves downcycling for use as architectural finishes or feedstock for processed wood-based materials.

    “Currently, the use of salvaged wood structural components often involves downcycling for use as architectural finishes or feedstock for processed wood-based materials.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Designing with irregular salvaged materials poses challenges both in terms of geometric and material heterogeneity.

    “Designing with irregular salvaged materials poses challenges both in terms of geometric and material heterogeneity.”
6 of 6

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Amtsberg, Felix, Yijiang Huang, Daniel J.M. Marshall, Kevin Moreno Gata, and Caitlin Mueller. 2020. "Structural Upcycling: Matching Digital and Natural Geometry." In Proceedings of Advances in Architectural Geometry.
  2. De Wolf, Catherine, Sultan Çetin, and Nancy MP Bocken. 2024. A Circular Built Environment in the Digital Age. Springer Nature.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blowes, R. M., Lee, K. J., Mayencourt, P., Kennedy, S., & Mueller, C.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
Structures and Architecture
Publisher
CRC Press
Published
2025-06-30
Pages
59-66
OpenAlex
W4411832476
Cited by
1
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
3.97
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
CRC Press eBooks (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Wood Treatment and Properties
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Optimization and Packing Problems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Architecture › Architecture and Computational Design
Keywords
circular construction, embodied carbon, construction and demolition waste, salvaged materials, timber slabs, mechanical modeling, algorithmic design, structural optimization, digital design workflow

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-18.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-18.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review