The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Buckwheat and CVD Risk Markers, a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.3390/nu10050619
Abstract
The effects of buckwheat intake on cardiovascular diseases (CVD) have not been systematically investigated. The aim of the present study was to comprehensively summarise studies in humans and animals evaluating the impact of buckwheat consumption on CVD risk markers and to conduct a meta-analysis of relevant data. Thirteen randomised, controlled human studies, two cross-sectional human studies and twenty-one animal studies were identified. Using random effects models, the weighted mean difference of post-intervention concentrations of blood glucose, total cholesterol and triglycerides were significantly decreased following buckwheat intervention compared with controls [differences in blood glucose: -0.85 mmol/L (95% CI: -1.31, -0.39), total cholesterol: 0.50 mmol/L (95% CI: -0.80, -0.20) and triglycerides: 0.25 mmol/L (95% CI: -0.49, -0.02)]. Responses of a similar magnitude were seen in two cross-sectional studies. For animal studies, nineteen of twenty-one studies showed a significant reduction in total cholesterol of between 12 and 54%, and fourteen of twenty studies showed a significant reduction in triglycerides of between 2 and 74%. All exhibited high unexplained heterogeneity. There was inconsistency in HDL cholesterol outcomes in both human and animal studies. It remains unclear whether increased buckwheat intake significantly benefits other markers of CVD risk, such as weight, blood pressure, insulin, and LDL-cholesterol, and underlying mechanisms responsible for any effects are unclear.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Aune, D., Keum, N., Giovannucci, E., Fadnes, L. T., Boffetta, P., Greenwood, D. C., Tonstad, S., Vatten, L. J., Riboli, E., & Norat, T. (2016) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.i2716 · Cited by 1,013
Flagged first, then by citations
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, L., Lietz, G., & Seal, C. J.
- Affiliations
- Newcastle University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Seal, Chris J.
- Venue
- Nutrients
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2018-03-19
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 619-619
- ISSN
- 2072-6643 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5986499
- OpenAlex
- W2789976934
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 0.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nutrients (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Preprints.org (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Seed and Plant Biochemistry
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nuts composition and effects
- Keywords
- buckwheat, cardiovascular risk markers, blood glucose, total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, dietary intervention, plant-based diet, animal studies
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Blood Glucose, Blood Pressure, Body Weight, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diet, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Insulin, Cholesterol, HDL, Cholesterol, LDL, Risk Factors, Sensitivity and Specificity, Triglycerides, Biomarkers, Body Mass Index, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Fagopyrum
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review