The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Science-Driven Societal Transformation, Part I: Worldview
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.3390/su12176881
Abstract
Humanity faces serious social and environmental problems, including climate change and biodiversity loss. Risks are increasing and conditions deteriorating. Increasingly, scientists, global policy experts, and the general public conclude that incremental approaches are insufficient and transformative change is needed across all sectors of society. However, the meaning of transformation is still unsettled in the literature, as is the proper role of science in fostering it. This paper is the first in a three-part series that adds to the discussion by proposing a novel science-driven research-and-development program aimed at societal transformation. More than a proposal, it offers a perspective and conceptual framework from which societal transformation might be approached and understood. While acknowledging the necessity of reform to existing societal systems (e.g., governance, economic, and financial systems), the focus of the series is on transformation understood as systems change or systems migration—the de novo development of and migration to new societal systems. The series provides definitions, aims, reasoning, worldview, and a theory of change, and discusses fitness metrics and design principles for new systems. This first paper proposes a worldview built using ideas from evolutionary biology, complex systems science, cognitive sciences, and information theory that is intended to serve as the foundation for the R&D program.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Scientists’ warning to humanity on the freshwater biodiversity crisis
Albert, J. S., Destouni, G., Duke-Sylvester, S. M., Magurran, A. E., Oberdorff, T., Reis, R. E., Winemiller, K. O., & Ripple, W. J. (2021) · Ambio · doi:10.1007/s13280-020-01318-8 · Cited by 943
Metadata
- Authors
- Boik, J.
- Affiliations
- Oregon State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Boik, John
- ORCID
- Boik, John
- Venue
- Sustainability
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2020-08-06
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 6881-6881
- ISSN
- 2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3015922964
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Preprints.org (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Systems and Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Innovation, Technology, and Society
- Keywords
- societal transformation, worldview, systemic change, evolutionary biology, complex systems science, cognitive science, information theory, climate change, biodiversity loss, theory of change, fitness metrics, system design principles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Science-Driven Societal Transformation, Part I: Worldview. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.20944/preprints202008.0160.v1
- The paper
- Boik, J. (2020). Science-Driven Societal Transformation, Part I: Worldview. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202008.0160.v1