PreprintCited by 131Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave PropagationStructural Health Monitoring TechniquesStructural Engineering and Materials Analysis

Ultrasonic Guided-Waves Sensors and Integrated Structural Health Monitoring Systems for Impact Detection and Localization: A Review

Open access
Capineri, Lorenzo, Bulletti, Andrea·2021·Sensors

Abstract

This review article is focused on the analysis of the state of the art of sensors for guided 9 ultrasonic waves for the detection and localization of impacts, therefore of interest for the structural 10 health monitoring (SHM). The recent developments in sensor technologies are then reported and 11 discussed through the many references in recent scientific literature. The physical phenomena re-12 lated to impact event and the main physical quantities are then introduced to discuss their im-13 portance in the development of the hardware and software components for SHM systems. An im-14 portant aspect of the article is the description of the different ultrasonic sensor technologies cur-15 rently present in the literature and what advantages and disadvantages they could bring, in relation 16 to the various phenomena investigated. In this context, the analysis of the front-end electronics is 17 deepened, the type of data transmission both in terms of wired and wireless technology and in terms 18 of online and offline signal processing. The integration aspects of sensors for the creation of net-19 works with autonomous nodes with the possibility of powering through energy harvesting devices 20 and the embedded processing capacity is also studied. Finally, the emerging sector of processing 21 techniques using deep learning and artificial intelligence concludes the review by indicating the 22 potential for the detection and autonomous characterization of the impacts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.20944/preprints202103.0347.v2

Cites

157 of 157 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Passive SHM methods can be successful for specific applications but lack accuracy, and damage might stay undetected.

    “While passive methods can be successful for specific applications, they lack accuracy, and damage might stay undetected [56,57].”

    From Effects of Environmental and Operational Conditions on Structural Health Monitoring and Non-Destructive Testing: A Systematic Review (2023) · cites this paper as [57]

    Section 3 describes passive piezoelectric sensing as a common method for detecting impacts, supporting its use in a specific application. Sections 2.4 and 4.2 discuss sources of impact-localization error and ways to improve accuracy, but do not say passive methods generally lack accuracy. The paper distinguishes passive impact detection from active damage evaluation; it does not establish that damage might remain undetected by passive methods. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [2]Auld B.A. Acoustic Fields and Waves in Solids Wiley New York, NY, USA 1973 978-0-471-03702-6
  2. [7]Giurgiutiu V. Structural Health Monitoring with Piezoelectric Wafer Active Sensors 2nd ed. Academic Press, an Imprint of Elsevier Amsterdam, The Netherlands 2014 978-0-12-418691-0
  3. [68]Izfp C.C. Wu K. Sun Z. Mrad N. A Comparative Study on Two Families of Integratable Ultrasound Transducers for Structural Health Monitoring Proceedings of the International Workshop on Smart Materials & Structures and NDT in Aerospace Montreal, QC, Canada 2–4 November 2011
  4. [136]Mateu L. Moll F. Review of Energy Harvesting Techniques and Applications for Microelectronics (Keynote Address) Volume 5837, VLSI Circuits and Systems II Lopez J.F. Fernandez F.V. Lopez-Villegas J.M. de la Rosa J.M. SPIE Bellingham, WA, USA 2005 359 373
  5. [155]IEEE Staff 2018 IEEE 4th World Forum on Internet of Things (WF IoT) IEEE Piscataway, NJ, USA 2018 978-1-4673-9945-6

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Capineri, L., & Bulletti, A.
Affiliations
University of Florence (IT)
Corresponding author
Capineri, Lorenzo
Venue
Sensors
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-04-07
Volume
21
Issue
9
Pages
2929-2929
ISSN
1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3138789180
Cited by
131
References
157
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 6
FWCI
2.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sensors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Preprints.org (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Engineering and Materials Analysis
Keywords
ultrasonic guided waves, structural health monitoring, impact detection, impact localization, ultrasonic sensors, front-end electronics, wireless data transmission, sensor networks, energy harvesting, embedded signal processing, deep learning, artificial intelligence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review