PreprintCited by 7Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer StudiesAI in cancer detectionImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques

Ιmage Perceptual Similarity Metrics for the Assessment of Basal Cell Carcinoma

Open access
Spyridonos, Panagiota, Likas, Aristidis, Seretis, Konstantinos, Moschovos, Vasileios, Feldmeyer, Laurence, Heidenmeyer, Kristine, Zampeta, Athanasia, Bassukas, Ioannis D. +1 more·2023·Cancers

Preprint — published as 10.3390/cancers15143539

Abstract

Efficient management of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) requires reliable assessments of both tumors and post-treatment scars. We aimed to estimate image similarity metrics that account for BCC's perceptual color and texture deviation from perilesional skin. 176 clinical photographs of BCC were assessed by six physicians using a visual deviation scale. Internal consistency and inter-rater agreement were estimated using Cronbach's α, weighted Gwet's AC2, and quadratic Cohen's Kappa. The mean visual scores were used to validate a range of similarity metrics employing different color spaces, distances, and image embeddings from pre-trained VGG16 neural network. The calculated similarities were transformed into discrete values using ordinal logistic regression models. The Bray-Curtis distance in the YIQ color model and rectified embeddings from the 'fc6' layer minimized the mean squared error and demonstrated strong performance in representing perceptual similarities. Box plot analysis and Wilcoxon rank-sum test were used to visualize and compare the levels of agreement, conducted on a random validation round between the two groups: ‘Human-System’ and ‘Human-Human’. The proposed metrics were comparable in terms of internal consistency and agreement with human raters. The findings suggest that the proposed metrics offer a robust, and cost-effective approach to monitoring BCC treatment outcomes in clinical settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.20944/preprints202306.0838.v1

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Feature-based similarity methods are robust to illumination changes and affine transformations.

    “Feature-Based Similarity [23-28]: By extracting high-level primitives such as edges, corners, and shapes using algorithms like ORB (Oriented FAST and Rotated BRIEF), these methods are robust to illumination changes and affine transformations.”

    From A Survey and Tutorial on Image Quality Assessment with a Contrast-Weighted Structural Similarity Framework (2026) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Introduction (p. 2) describes similarity metrics based on CNN image embeddings, and the Discussion (p. 9) addresses their agreement with human ratings. Neither passage establishes robustness to illumination changes or affine transformations; searches for those terms and for feature-based invariance found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 39 · Cited by 7

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [4]4. Choo, A.M.H.; Ong, Y.S.; Issa, F. Scar Assessment Tools: How Do They Compare? Front. Surg. 2021 , 8 , 206, doi:10.3389/FSURG.2021.643098/BIBTEX. · DOI
  2. [8]8. Basson, R.; Bayat, A. Skin Scarring: Latest Update on Objective Assessment and Optimal Management. Front. Med. 2022 , 9 , doi:10.3389/FMED.2022.942756/FULL. · DOI
  3. [25]25. Thakur, N.; Mehrotra, D.; Bansal, A.; Bala, M. Analysis and Implementation of the Bray -Curtis DistanceBased Similarity Measure for Retrieving Information from the Medical Repository BT - International Conference on Innovative Computing and Communications.; Bhattacharyya, S., Hassanien, A.E., Gupta, D., Khanna, A., Pan, I., Eds.; Springer Singapore: Singapore, 2019; pp. 117 -125.
  4. [26]26. Naik, J.; Doyle, S.; Basavanhally, A.; Ganesan, S.; Feldman, M.D.; Tomaszewski, J.E.; Madabhushi, A. A Boosted Distance Metric: Application to Content Based Image Retrieval and Classification of Digitized Histopathology. In Proceedings of the Medical Imaging 2009: Computer-Aided Diagnosis; SPIE, March 3 2009; Vol. 7260, p. 72603F.
  5. [27]27. Samantaray, A.K.; Rahulkar, A.D. Comparison of Similarity Measurement Metrics on Medical Image Data. In Proceedings of the 2019 10th International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT); IEEE, July 2019; pp. 1 -5.
  6. [33]33. Deng, J.; Dong, W.; Socher, R.; Li, L.-J.; Kai Li; Li Fei-Fei ImageNet: A Large-Scale Hierarchical Image Database. In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition; IEEE, June 1 2009; pp. 248 -255.

Authors
Spyridonos, P., Likas, A., Seretis, K., Moschovos, V., Feldmeyer, L., Heidenmeyer, K., Zampeta, A., Bassukas, I. D., & Gaitanis, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Ioannina (GR)
  • University of Bern (CH)
Venue
Cancers
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-06-12
Volume
15
Issue
14
Pages
3539-3539
ISSN
2072-6694 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4383819857
Cited by
7
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancers (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Preprints.org (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Keywords
basal cell carcinoma, image similarity measures, skin texture, Bray-Curtis distance, YIQ color space, treatment outcome monitoring, clinical photographs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review