PreprintCited by 5Protein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsEnzyme Structure and Function

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

TAFPred: Torsion Angle Fluctuations Prediction from Protein Sequences

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.3390/biology12071020 · Paper page

Abstract

Protein molecules show varying degrees of flexibility throughout their three-dimensional structures. This flexibility is associated with the fluctuation of the torsion angle in proteins. The protein backbone can be defined mainly by two torsion angles, phi (φ) and psi (ψ). The fluctuation of torsion angles is derived from different NMR models’ variations in backbone torsion angles. The angle fluctuations in the cartesian coordinate space are used to characterize the protein’s structural flexibility. Fluctuation of torsion angle is useful in predicting protein function and structure when the torsion angles are used as restraints. This study aims to develop a machine learning method to predict torsion angle fluctuations directly from protein sequences. It explores various useful features such as disorder probability, position-specific scoring matrix profiles, secondary structure probabilities, monograms, bigram, position-specific estimated energy, half-sphere exposures, etc. Likewise, it explores well-known machine learning methods and proposes an optimized Light Gradient Boosting Machine Regressor (LightGBM) method, named TAFPred, to predict torsion angle fluctuations with the selected features. The proposed method achieves ten-fold cross-validated correlation coefficients of 0.746 and 0.737 and mean absolute errors of 0.114 and 0.123 for the angle fluctuation of φ and ψ, respectively, and attains an improvement of 10.08% in MAE, 24.83% in PCC in the phi angle, and 9.93% in MAE, 22.37% in PCC in psi angle compared to the state-of-the-art method proposed by Zhang et al.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.20944/preprints202307.0012.v1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Torsion angles phi (φ) and psi (ψ). The phi angle is the angle around the -N-CA- bond (where ‘CA’ is the alpha-carbon), and the psi angle is the angle around the -CA-C- bond.
Figure 1 Torsion angles phi (φ) and psi (ψ). The phi angle is the angle around the -N-CA- bond (where ‘CA’ is the alpha-carbon), and the psi angle is the angle around the -CA-C- bond.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Illustration of the workflow of the torsion angle fluctuation predictions.
Figure 2 Illustration of the workflow of the torsion angle fluctuation predictions.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Feature extraction from different tools.
Figure 3 Feature extraction from different tools.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Selection of sliding window size with optimized LightGBM regressor (phi angle). Among the tested window sizes, it was found that a window size of 3 achieved the highest 1-MAE+PCC (mean absolute error + Pearson correlation coefficient) for the psi angle.
Figure 4 Selection of sliding window size with optimized LightGBM regressor (phi angle). Among the tested window sizes, it was found that a window size of 3 achieved the highest 1-MAE+PCC (mean absolute error + Pearson correlation coefficient) for the psi angle.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Selection of sliding window size with optimized LightGBM regressor (psi angle). Among the tested window sizes, it was found that a window size of 3 yielded the highest value of 1-MAE+PCC for the psi angle.
Figure 5 Selection of sliding window size with optimized LightGBM regressor (psi angle). Among the tested window sizes, it was found that a window size of 3 yielded the highest value of 1-MAE+PCC for the psi angle.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 6 The torsion-angle fluctuation is depicted in its distribution, with the data points divided into 10 bins. The fluctuations of the phi and psi angles are visually represented using red and green colors, respectively.
Figure 6 The torsion-angle fluctuation is depicted in its distribution, with the data points divided into 10 bins. The fluctuations of the phi and psi angles are visually represented using red and green colors, respectively.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 7 The relationship between Δφ and Δψ is shown in the figure, revealing that the majority of residues exhibit small fluctuations below 0.2.
Figure 7 The relationship between Δφ and Δψ is shown in the figure, revealing that the majority of residues exhibit small fluctuations below 0.2.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 8 Relationship between torsion-angle fluctuation in the phi angle and disordered regions. The disordered probability was obtained from the SPOT-Disordered2 tool. The figure illustrates that regions with low disordered probability exhibit correspondingly low fluctuations in the phi angle, and conversely, regions with high disordered probability show higher fluctuations in the phi angle.
Figure 8 Relationship between torsion-angle fluctuation in the phi angle and disordered regions. The disordered probability was obtained from the SPOT-Disordered2 tool. The figure illustrates that regions with low disordered probability exhibit correspondingly low fluctuations in the phi angle, and conversely, regions with high disordered probability show higher fluctuations in the phi angle.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 9 Correlation between torsion-angle fluctuation in the psi angle and the presence of disordered regions. The disordered probability was obtained through the utilization of the SPOT-Disordered2 tool. The figure clearly illustrates that regions with low disordered probability exhibit lower fluctuations in the psi angle, while regions with high disordered probability tend to have higher fluctuations in the psi angle.
Figure 9 Correlation between torsion-angle fluctuation in the psi angle and the presence of disordered regions. The disordered probability was obtained through the utilization of the SPOT-Disordered2 tool. The figure clearly illustrates that regions with low disordered probability exhibit lower fluctuations in the psi angle, while regions with high disordered probability tend to have higher fluctuations in the psi angle.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Metadata

Authors
Kabir, M. W. U., Alawad, D. M., Mishra, A., & Hoque, M. T.
Affiliations
  • LSU New Orleans (US)
  • Texas A&M University – Kingsville (US)
Corresponding author
Hoque, Md Tamjidul
Venue
Biology
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-07-03
Volume
12
Issue
7
Pages
1020-1020
ISSN
2079-7737 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4384929351
Cited by
5
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Preprints.org (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
U.S. Department of Homeland Security (21STSLA00011-01-0)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
phi and psi angles, protein flexibility, sequence-based prediction, LightGBM regression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review