PreprintCited by 6Hemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyCongenital Heart Disease StudiesCardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques

Analysis of P(v-a)CO2/C(a-v)O2 Ratio and Other Perfusion Markers in a Population of 98 Pediatric Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery

Open access
Taiana, Matteo, Tomasella, Irene, Russo, Alessandro, Lerose, Annalisa, Graziadei, Marcello ceola, Corubolo, Luisa, Rama, Jacopo, Schweiger, Vittorio +6 more·2023·Journal of Clinical Medicine

Preprint — published as 10.3390/jcm12175700

Abstract

BACKGROUNDː The so-called Low Cardiac Output Syndrome (LCOS) is one of the most common complications in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease undergoing corrective surgery. LCOS requires high concentrations of inotropes to support cardiac contractility and improve cardiac output, allowing for a better systemic perfusion. To date, serum lactate concentrations and central venous oxygen saturation (ScVO2) are the most commonly used perfusion markers, but they are not completely reliable to identify a state of global tissue hypoxia. The study aims to evaluate whether the venoarterial carbon dioxide difference/arterial-venous oxygen difference ratio [P(v-a)CO2/C(a-v)O2] can be a good index to predict the development of LCOS in the aforemen-tioned patients, so as to treat it promptly. METHODSː This study followed a population of 98 children undergoing corrective cardiac surgery from June 2018 to October 2020 at the Department of Cardiac Surgery of University Hospital Inte-grated Trust and their subsequent admission at the Postoperative Cardiothoracic Surgery Intensive Care Unit. During the study, central arterial and venous blood gas analysis were carried out before and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) (pre-CPB and post-CPB), at admission to intensive care unit, before and after extubation and at any time of instability or modification of the patient’s clinical and therapeutic conditions. RESULTSː The data analysis shows that 46.9% of the children developed a LCOS (in line with the current literature) but that there is no statistically significant association between the P(v-a)CO2/C(a-v)O2 ratio and LCOS onset. Despite the limits of statistical significance, however, a 31% increase in the ratio emerged from the pre-CPB phase to the post-CPB phase when LCOS is present. CONCLUSIONSː This study confirms a statistically significant association between the most used markers in adult patients (serum lactate concentration, ScVO2 and oxygen extraction ratio-ERO2) measured in the pre-CPB phase and the incidence of LCOS onset, especially in patients with he-modynamic instability before surgery.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.20944/preprints202308.1985.v1

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ratio of the veno-arterial carbon dioxide pressure difference to the arterial-venous oxygen content difference [P(v-a)CO2/C(a-v)O2] has been identified as a potential marker of tissue hypoxia secondary to circulatory failure.

    “Recent research identified the ratio of the veno-arterial carbon dioxide pressure difference to the arterial–venous oxygen content difference [P(v-a)CO2/C(a-v)O2] as a potential marker of tissue hypoxia secondary to circulatory failure [41].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 27 · Cited by 6

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Sanfilippo F, Currò JM, La Via L, Dezio V, Martucci G, Brancati S, Murabito P, Pappalardo F, Astuto M. Use of nafamostatmesilate for anticoagulationduringextracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A systematic review. ArtificialOrgans. 2022;46;2371-2381. Doi: 10.1111/aor14276. · DOI

Authors
Taiana, M., Tomasella, I., Russo, A., Lerose, A., Graziadei, M. C., Corubolo, L., Rama, J., Schweiger, V., Vignola, A., Polati, E., Luciani, G. B., Onorati, F., Donadello, K., & Gottin, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Verona (IT)
  • Azienda ULSS 9 Scaligera (IT)
Corresponding author
Taiana, Matteo
Venue
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-08-29
Volume
12
Issue
17
Pages
5700-5700
ISSN
2077-0383 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386379937
Cited by
6
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2
FWCI
1.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Preprints.org (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Iris (University of Trento) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
Keywords
low cardiac output syndrome, pediatric cardiac surgery, arteriovenous oxygen difference, serum lactate, central venous oxygen saturation, oxygen extraction fraction, cardiopulmonary bypass, congenital heart disease, hemodynamic instability, tissue hypoxia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review