Analysis of P(v-a)CO2/C(a-v)O2 Ratio and Other Perfusion Markers in a Population of 98 Pediatric Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.3390/jcm12175700
Abstract
BACKGROUNDː The so-called Low Cardiac Output Syndrome (LCOS) is one of the most common complications in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease undergoing corrective surgery. LCOS requires high concentrations of inotropes to support cardiac contractility and improve cardiac output, allowing for a better systemic perfusion. To date, serum lactate concentrations and central venous oxygen saturation (ScVO2) are the most commonly used perfusion markers, but they are not completely reliable to identify a state of global tissue hypoxia. The study aims to evaluate whether the venoarterial carbon dioxide difference/arterial-venous oxygen difference ratio [P(v-a)CO2/C(a-v)O2] can be a good index to predict the development of LCOS in the aforemen-tioned patients, so as to treat it promptly. METHODSː This study followed a population of 98 children undergoing corrective cardiac surgery from June 2018 to October 2020 at the Department of Cardiac Surgery of University Hospital Inte-grated Trust and their subsequent admission at the Postoperative Cardiothoracic Surgery Intensive Care Unit. During the study, central arterial and venous blood gas analysis were carried out before and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) (pre-CPB and post-CPB), at admission to intensive care unit, before and after extubation and at any time of instability or modification of the patient’s clinical and therapeutic conditions. RESULTSː The data analysis shows that 46.9% of the children developed a LCOS (in line with the current literature) but that there is no statistically significant association between the P(v-a)CO2/C(a-v)O2 ratio and LCOS onset. Despite the limits of statistical significance, however, a 31% increase in the ratio emerged from the pre-CPB phase to the post-CPB phase when LCOS is present. CONCLUSIONSː This study confirms a statistically significant association between the most used markers in adult patients (serum lactate concentration, ScVO2 and oxygen extraction ratio-ERO2) measured in the pre-CPB phase and the incidence of LCOS onset, especially in patients with he-modynamic instability before surgery.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The ratio of the veno-arterial carbon dioxide pressure difference to the arterial-venous oxygen content difference [P(v-a)CO2/C(a-v)O2] has been identified as a potential marker of tissue hypoxia secondary to circulatory failure.
“Recent research identified the ratio of the veno-arterial carbon dioxide pressure difference to the arterial–venous oxygen content difference [P(v-a)CO2/C(a-v)O2] as a potential marker of tissue hypoxia secondary to circulatory failure [41].”
From Trends and Challenges in Noninvasive Hemodynamic Monitoring of Neonates Following Cardiac Surgery: A Narrative Review (2025) · cites this paper as [41]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 27 · Cited by 6
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Sanfilippo F, Currò JM, La Via L, Dezio V, Martucci G, Brancati S, Murabito P, Pappalardo F, Astuto M. Use of nafamostatmesilate for anticoagulationduringextracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A systematic review. ArtificialOrgans. 2022;46;2371-2381. Doi: 10.1111/aor14276. · DOI
- Authors
- Taiana, M., Tomasella, I., Russo, A., Lerose, A., Graziadei, M. C., Corubolo, L., Rama, J., Schweiger, V., Vignola, A., Polati, E., Luciani, G. B., Onorati, F., Donadello, K., & Gottin, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Verona (IT)
- Azienda ULSS 9 Scaligera (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Taiana, Matteo
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2023-08-29
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 5700-5700
- ISSN
- 2077-0383 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10488867
- OpenAlex
- W4386379937
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 1.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Preprints.org (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Iris (University of Trento) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Congenital Heart Disease Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
- Keywords
- low cardiac output syndrome, pediatric cardiac surgery, arteriovenous oxygen difference, serum lactate, central venous oxygen saturation, oxygen extraction fraction, cardiopulmonary bypass, congenital heart disease, hemodynamic instability, tissue hypoxia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review