PreprintCited by 19Global Energy and Sustainability ResearchSustainability and Climate Change GovernanceRenewable energy and sustainable power systems

Sustainable Energy: Concept and Definition in the Context of the Energy Transition - A Critical Review

Open access
Halawa, Edward·2024·Sustainability

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The term sustainable energy is very familiar to all of us yet its exact definition or meaning has so far been vague. To date the widely adopted definition of sustainable energy has been inspired by the definition of sustainable development formulated more than 30 years ago in the Our Common Future - the UN’s Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. The current definition conceals the true spirit of the Report and this has some ramifications. It raises the question as to whether we have put too much emphasis on attaining the future dimension of sustainability in the middle of the situation where the energy survivability is in fact the real issue in many parts of the world. In this paper the role of energy in sustaining livelihoods of low income communities is discussed. Existing definition of sustainable energy that the whole world seems to have embraced is looked at critically and its downsides exposed. The identified pillars of sustainable energy and the associated issues is discussed and the need for an additional pillar, i.e. affordability is discussed and called for. This paper will argue that global definition of sustainable energy seems inappropriate and should be jettisoned and a more realistic definition should be formulated, adopted and embraced at local (i.e. national or regional) level taking into account local attributes and factors. The current push for a transition from the reliance on conventional energy sources to ‘cleaner’ energy sources (generally associated with renewable energy) has further exacerbated the issue of energy affordability that has made the conditions even more dire for so many groups of the world population. In the midst of this situation, those who push for a rushed energy transition seem to be those who also produce unsustainably high carbon footprint but who can easily offset their carbon foot-print through the ‘net-zero’ concept.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.20944/preprints202312.1831.v3

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Second-generation biofuels face higher capital costs due to complex pre-treatment and conversion processes, though cost reductions are anticipated with technological maturation and integrated biorefinery concepts.

    “Secondgeneration biofuels face even higher capital costs [390] due to complex pre-treatment and conversion processes, though cost reductions are anticipated with technological maturation and integrated biorefinery concepts valorizing co-products [252,391].”

    From Biofuels, E-Fuels, and Waste-Derived Fuels: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions (2025) · cites this paper as [390]

    Section 6 discusses the cost of renewable-energy systems generally, but does not address second-generation biofuels or their capital costs. Searches for second-generation biofuels, pre-treatment, conversion processes, and biorefineries found no passage supporting the claim attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Current EU tank-to-wheel emissions accounting tends to favor electric vehicles and hydrogen fuel cell vehicles by not fully accounting for upstream emissions from electricity generation or manufacturing of vehicles and batteries.

    “The current EU TTW emissions accounting approach tends to favor electric vehicles and hydrogen fuel cell vehicles by not fully accounting for upstream emissions from electricity generation or the manufacturing of vehicles and batteries [390].”

    From Biofuels, E-Fuels, and Waste-Derived Fuels: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions (2025) · cites this paper as [390]

    The Abstract and Section 7 discuss the energy transition and emissions generally, but neither addresses EU tank-to-wheel accounting. Searches for TTW accounting and for vehicle, battery, and electricity-production emissions found no passage supporting the claimed accounting bias toward electric or hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. McCubbing, G., Fowler, E. Energy affordability exposes brutal divide between rich and poor -an article in Financial Review published on 2 February 2023 -https://www.afr.com/companies/energy/energy- affordability-exposes-brutal-divide-between-rich-and-poor-20230202-p5chex (Accessed on 6 December 2023).
  2. Brundtland Report, 1987 -The World Commission on Environment and Development -Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  3. Fanger, P.O. Thermal Comfort: Analysis and Applications in Environmental Engineering; McGraw Hill Book Company: New York, NY, USA, 1970.
  4. Tester, J.W.; Drake, E.M.; Driscoll, M.J.; Golay, M.W.; Peters, W.A. Sustainable Energy -Choosing Among Options -Second edition -The MIT Press. 2012, p. 10.
  5. Fuller, R.B. Critical Path; St. Martins Press: New York, NY, USA, 1981.
  6. Halawa, E. Penalty-reward-pinch (PRP) design for improving sustainability of existing commercial buildings -Chapter 3.1 in: Sustainable retrofitting of commercial buildings -Warm Climates -edited by R. Hyde, N. Groenhout, F. Barram and K. Yeang. Earthscan -Routledge -Taylor and Francis Group, 2013.
  7. Greenpeace International website. Davos revealed, as global leaders head into World Economic Forum - https://www.greenpeace.org/international/press-release/57867/hundreds-of-ultra-short-private-jet-flights- to-davos-world-economic-forum/ -Accessed 7 December 2023.
  8. Dove, S. Assumptions of science: 5 reasons you should be skeptical. - https://www.shawndove.com/assumptions-of-science/ -Accessed 7 December 2023. Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 27 December 2023 doi:10.20944/preprints202312.1831.v1 · DOI
  9. Fleissner, P.; Hofkirchner, W. Entropy and Its Implications for Sustainability -In: Dragan, J.C., Demetrescu, M.C., Seifert, E.K. (Eds.), Implications and Applications of Bioeconomics, Proceedings of the Second International Conference of the E.A.B.S., Palma de Mallorca, 1994, Edizioni Nagard, Milano 1997, 147-155.
  10. Sutherland, W.J.; Burgman, M. Use experts wisely. Nature. 2015, Vol. 526, pp. 317 -318.

Cited by

Authors
Halawa, E.
Affiliations
Charles Darwin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Halawa, Edward
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-01-31
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
1523-1523
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391748637
Cited by
19
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Preprints.org (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Global Energy and Sustainability Research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Renewable energy and sustainable power systems
Keywords
sustainable energy, energy transition, sustainable development, energy affordability, low-income communities, livelihoods, renewable energy, net-zero emissions, carbon footprint, local sustainability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review