Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
PreprintCited by 19Energy, Environment, Economic GrowthEnergy, Environment, and Transportation PoliciesClimate Change Policy and Economics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rebound Effects Caused by Artificial Intelligence and Automation in Private Life and Industry

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.3390/su17051988

Abstract

Many tasks in a modern household are performed by machines, e.g., a dishwasher or a vacuum cleaner, and in the near future most household tasks will be performed by smart service robots. This will relieve the residents, who in turn can enjoy their free time. This newly gained free time will turn out to cause the so-called spare time rebound effect due to more resource consumption. We roughly quantify this rebound effect and propose a CO2-budget model to reduce or even avoid it. In modern industry, automation and AI are taking over work from humans, leading to higher productivity of the company as a whole. This is the main reason for economic growth, which leads to environmental problems due to higher consumption of natural resources. We show that, even though the effects of automation at home and in the industry are different (free time versus higher productivity), in the end they both lead to more resource consumption and environmental pollution. We discuss possible solutions to this problem, such as carbon taxes, emissions trading systems, and a carbon budget.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.20944/preprints202409.0504.v1

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [2]2. Ertel, W. Artificial Intelligence, the Spare Time Rebound Effect and how the ECG would avoid it. International Conference: Economy for the Common Good (ECGPW-2019); , 2019.
  2. [5]5. Dittmann, A. Energiewirtschaft ; Springer-Verlag, 1998.
  3. [7]7. Lippelt, J.; Sindram, M. Global energy consumption. CESifo Forum 1/2011 2019 , pp. 80-82.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Ertel, W., & Bonenberger, C.
Affiliations
University of Applied Sciences Ravensburg-Weingarten (DE)
Corresponding author
Ertel, Wolfgang
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-09-06
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
1988-1988
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4407977794
Cited by
12
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5
FWCI
11.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Preprints.org (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
Keywords
rebound effect, artificial intelligence, automation, home robots, leisure, resource consumption, environmental pollution, industrial productivity, economic growth, carbon tax, emissions trading, carbon balance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.