PreprintCited by 14Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactAnalytical chemistry methods development

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Study of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals in Infant Formulas and Baby Bottles: Data from the European LIFE‐MILCH PROJECT

Open access

Abstract

Exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) is inevitable, and growing scientific evidence indicates that even very low doses can negatively impact human health, particularly during pregnancy and the neonatal period. As part of the European project LIFE18 ENV/IT/00460, this study aims to identify the presence of EDCs in 20 infant formulas (both powdered and liquid) and the release from baby bottles and teats. Particularly, sensitization of young people and future parents towards the potential harmful effects of EDCs could significantly help to reduce exposure. Seven different UPLC-MS/MS methodologies and one ICP-AES were set-up to quantify already assessed and suspected EDCs among 85 different chemicals (bisphenols, parabens, phthalates, pesticides, herbicides, and their main metabolites, PFAS, and metals). Results showed that in 2 out of 14 baby bottles only anthracene and phenanthrene of the group of PAHs were released (10.68-10.81 ng/mL). Phthalates such as mono-ethyl phthalate (MEP) were found in 9 of 14 samples (0.054–0.140 ng/mL), while mono(2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl) phthalate (MeOHP) appeared in 2 samples (0.870–0.930 ng/mL). In accordance with current EU regulations, other chemicals were not detected in baby bottles and teats. However, Bisphenols, Parabens, PAHs, Phthalates, PFAS and Metals were detected in infant formula, emphasizing the need for continued monitoring and public health interventions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.20944/preprints202410.0667.v1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Nuti, F., Real Fernández, F., Severi, M., Traversi, R., Fanos, V., Street, M. E., Palanza, P., Rovero, P., & Papini, A. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Florence (IT)
  • University of Cagliari (IT)
  • University of Parma (IT)
Corresponding author
Papini, Anna Maria
Venue
Molecules
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-10-09
Volume
29
Issue
22
Pages
5434-5434
ISSN
1420-3049 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4404497169
Cited by
14
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 5
FWCI
2.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecules (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Preprints.org (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UNICA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Cagliari) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
European Commission (LIFE18 ENV/IT/00460)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
Keywords
endocrine disruptors, infant formula, baby bottles, teat, chemical releases, phthalates, monoethyl phthalate, MEOHP, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, anthracene, phenanthrene, bisphenols, parabens, PFAS, pesticides, herbicides, metals, infant exposure
MeSH terms
Europe, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Phthalic Acids, Infant Formula, Endocrine Disruptors, Tandem Mass Spectrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review