PreprintCited by 13Polymer crystallization and propertiesbiodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesNatural Fiber Reinforced Composites

Development and Characterization of PBS/EA Cellulose and PCL/EA Cellulose Biocomposites: Structural, Morphological, and Thermal Insights for Sustainable Applications

Open access
Kumalo, Fisokuhle Innocentia, Malimabe, Moipone Alice, Mosoabisane, Mafereka Francis Tyson, Gumede, Thandi Patricia·2025·Polymers

Preprint — published as 10.3390/polym17070971

Abstract

This study investigates the development and characterization of PBS/EA cellulose and PCL/EA cellulose biocomposites in order to understand their structural, morphological, and thermal properties for sustainable applications. Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscope (SEM), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) were used to analyze these properties. FTIR analysis of PBS/EA cellulose composites showed increased hydroxyl peak intensities, suggesting possible interactions, whereas PCL/EA cellulose composites exhibited no significant interactions. XRD results revealed improved crystallinity in both composites with increased EA cellulose content. SEM images indicated enhanced surface morphology and good interaction in PBS/EA cellulose composites while PCL/EA cellulose composites showed a sea-island morphology, implying poor compatibility. DSC analysis showed that EA cellulose lowered the melting temperature of PBS, while minimal effects were observed in PCL composites. TGA results demonstrated improved thermal stability at lower EA cellulose contents in both PBS and PCL composites. These findings provide valuable insights into the potential of PBS/EA cellulose and PCL/EA cellulose biocomposites as biocompatible and sustainable materials, especially for applications in biomedical and environmentally friendly packaging sectors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.20944/preprints202502.1813.v1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kumalo, F. I., Malimabe, M. A., Mosoabisane, M. F. T., & Gumede, T. P.
Affiliations
  • Central University of Technology (ZA)
  • University of the Free State (ZA)
  • South African Nuclear Energy Corporation (South Africa) (ZA)
Corresponding author
Gumede, Thandi Patricia
Venue
Polymers
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2025-02-24
Volume
17
Issue
7
Pages
971-971
ISSN
2073-4360 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4409096445
Cited by
13
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 2
FWCI
3.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Polymers (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Preprints.org (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation
  • Sasol
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer crystallization and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
Keywords
poly(butylene succinate), polycaprolactone, nucleation, crystallization behavior, crystallinity, heat of fusion, melting point, ether linkage, lamellar thickness, biodegradable polymers, sustainable materials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review