Cited by 23Geology and Environmental Impact StudiesMine drainage and remediation techniquesSeedling growth and survival studies

SUSTAINABLE MINED LAND RECLAMATION IN THE EASTERN U. S. COALFIELDS: A CASE FOR AN ECOSYSTEM RECLAMATION APPROACH

Open access
Burger, J. A.·2011·Journal American Society of Mining and Reclamation

Abstract

The demand for energy throughout the world grows each day, and coal will be needed to meet a large portion of that demand.Coal mining techniques in the Appalachian and Midwestern coalfields have evolved to mine larger land areas and multiple seams at greater depths.New reclamation methods and approaches also must evolve to minimize cumulative impacts on aquatic, terrestrial, and human resources.Mined land reforestation practices over the past 80 years illustrate the evolution of reclamation in the eastern coalfields of the U. S. Prior to the implementation of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act (SMCRA), tree planting was synonymous with reclamation.Grassland reclamation became the dominant approach post-SMCRA.As stakeholders of the mining and reclamation process have begun to appreciate the value of forest ecosystems, there is greater emphasis on ensuring land and forest restoration and proper ecosystem functioning on reclaimed mined land.A forestry reclamation approach is supplanting grassland reclamation where forests are the logical postmining land use.Restoring forestland capability, native species, and watershed protection are positive outcomes.However, greater public demand for stream protection, water quality, biodiversity, carbon sequestration, native wildlife habitat, and human protection may require a more comprehensive ecosystem reclamation approach.In my view, the components of such an approach already have a good basis in science and could be applied through a process of adaptive management in the event such an approach is needed to help the coal industry in the U. S. maintain its social license to operate.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21000/jasmr11010113

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The stability of dumping depends on topsoil dumping techniques or geomorphic landform design.

    “The stability of dumping depends on topsoil dumping techniques or geomorphic landform design (Topp et al., 2010;Burger, 2011).”

    From Effects of surface coal mining and land reclamation on soil properties: A review (2019) · cites this paper as Burger, 2011

    In “Improved Reclamation Approaches” (page unavailable), Burger proposes geomorphic landscape design to create stable slopes resistant to erosion and mass wasting. The section discusses placing salvaged topsoil to restore biodiversity and support deep-rooted trees, but does not link topsoil dumping techniques to the stability of dumped material. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Loosely placing RMS restores hydrologic flow paths, allowing water infiltration, storage, drainage, and groundwater recharge.

    “For the maintenance of hydrological stability, loosely placing RMS restores hydrologic flow paths, allowing water infiltration, storage, drainage, and groundwater recharge (Burger, 2011).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Amichev, B. Y., J. A.,Burger, and J. A. Rodrigue. 2008. Carbon sequestration by forests and soils on mined land in the Midwestern and Appalachian coalfields of the U.S. Forest Ecology and Management 256:1949-1959. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.07.020 · DOI
  2. Anderson, B. W. and R. D. Ohmart, 1985. Riparian revegetation as a mitigating process in stream and river restoration. p. 41-80. In: J. Gore (ed.). The Restoration of Rivers and Streams, Butterworth, Boston, Massachusetts.
  3. Ayres, B., B. Dobchuk, D. Christensen, M. O'Kane, and M. Fawcett. 2006. Incorporation of natural slope features into the design of final landforms for waste rock stockpiles. 7th International Conference on Acid Rock Drainage, 2006 pp 59-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.21000/jasmr06020059.. · DOI
  4. Baker, K. L. 2009. Costs of reclamation on southern Appalachian coal mines: A cost-effectiveness analysis for reforestation versus hayland/pasture reclamation. M.S. Thesis. Virginia Tech, Blacksburg.
  5. Bernhardt, E. S., and M. A. Palmer. 2011. The environmental costs of mountaintop mining valley fill operations for aquatic ecosystems of the Central Appalachians. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1223:39-57/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.05986.x · DOI
  6. Burger, J. A. 1997. Conceptual framework for monitoring the impacts of intensive forest management on sustainable forestry. In Hakkila, P., Heino, M., E. Puranen, E. (Eds.), Forest Management for Bioenergy. The Finnish Forest Research Institute, Vantaa Research Centre, Res. Pap. 640, pp. 147-156.
  7. Burger, J. A., D. O. Mitchem, C. E. Zipper, and R. Williams. 2008. Hardwood reforestation for Phase III bond release: Need for reduced ground cover. Proceedings America Society of Mining and Reclamation, 2008 pp 192-205. http://dx.doi.org/10.21000/JASMR08010192. · DOI
  8. Brundtland, G. H. (ed.). 1987. Our Common Future: The World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  9. Costanza, R. R. d'Arge, R. de Groot, S. Farber, M. Grasso, B. Hannon, K. Limburg, S. Naeem, R.V. O'Neill, J. Paruelo, R. G. Raskin, P. Sutton, and M. VandenBelt. 1997. The value of the World's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253-260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/387253a0. · DOI · Paper page
  10. Cowell, S. J., W. Wehrmeyer, P. W. Argust, and G. S. Robertson. 1999. Sustainability and the primary extraction industries: theories and practice. Resources Policy 25:277-286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4207(00)00003-9. · DOI
  11. Davis, G. (ed.). 1965. A guide for revegetating bituminous strip-mine spoils in Pennsylvania. USDA Forest Service. 46 p. Doolittle, W. T. 1958. Site index comparisons for several forest species in the Southern Appalachians. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 22:450-458. http://dx.doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1958.03615995002200050023x. · DOI
  12. Fields-Johnson, C., C. E. Zipper, J. A. Burger, and D. M. Evans. 2010. Second year response of Appalachian mixed hardwoods to soil surface grading and herbaceous ground cover on reclaimed mine land. Proceedings America Society of Mining and Reclamation, 2010 305-318. http://dx.doi.org/10.21000/JASMR1001030518. · DOI
  13. Fritz, K. M., S. Fulton, B. R. Johnson, C. C. Barton, J. D. Jack, D. A. Word, and R. A. Burke. 2010. Structural and functional characteristics of natural and constructed channels draining a reclaimed mountaintop removal and valley fill coal mine. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 29:673-689. http://dx.doi.org/10.1899/09-060. · DOI
  14. Heal, G. 2000. Nature and the marketplace: Capturing the value of ecosystem services. Island Press. Washington, DC. 195 p.
  15. Holl, K. D. 2002. Long-term vegetation recovery on reclaimed coal surface mines in the eastern USA. J. Appl. Ecol. 39:960-970. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2002.00767.x. · DOI
  16. Humphreys, D. 2001. Sustainable development: Can the mining industry afford it? Resources Policy 27:1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4207(01)00003-4. · DOI
  17. In J. E. Brandt (ed.). Proc., 14th Natl. Mtg., Amer. Soc. for Surface Mining and Reclamation, Princeton, WV.
  18. Kurlander, L. T. 2001. Newmont Mining: The social license to operate. Global Executive Forum. Univ. of Colorado, Inst. for Intl. Business and Center for Intl. Business Educ. and Res. https://doi.org/10.21000/JASMR97010344 · DOI
  19. McCart, G. D. (ed.). 1973. Guidelines for reclamation and revegetation surface-mined coal areas in southwest Virginia. Extension Division, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg. MA-142.
  20. McComb W. C., K. McGarigal, J. D. Fraser, and W. H. Davis. 1989. Planning for basin-level cumulative effects in the Appalachian coal field. Trans. 54 th N. Amer Wildland and Natural Resour. Conf. 54:102-112.
  21. Michael, P. R., M. J. Superfesky, and L. J. Uranowski. 2010. Challenges to applying geomorphic and stream reclamation methodologies to mountaintop mining and excess spoil fill construction in steep-slope topography (e.g. Central Appalachia), Proceedings America Society of Mining and Reclamation, 2010 pp 610-634. http://dx.doi.org/10.21000/JASMR10010610 · DOI
  22. Mudd, G. M. 2010. The environmental sustainability of mining in Australia: Key mega-trends and looming constraints. Resources Policy 35:98-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2009.12.001 · DOI
  23. Orndorff, Z., W. L. Daniels, M. Beck, and M. Eick. 2010. Leaching potentials of coal spoil and refuse: Acid-base interactions and electrical conductivity, Proceedings America Society of Mining and Reclamation, 2010 pp 736-766. http://dx.doi.org/10.21000/JASMR10010736 · DOI
  24. Palmer, M. A., E. S. Bernhard, W. H. Schlesinger, K. N. Eshelman, E. Foufoula-Georgiou, M. S. Hendryx, A. D. Lemly, G. E. Likens, O. L. Loucks, M.E. Power, P. S. White, and P. R. Wilcock. 2010. Mountaintop mining consequences. Science 327:148-149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1180543 · DOI
  25. Putz, F. E., and C. D. Canham. 1992. Mechanisms of arrested succession in shrublands: root and shoot competition between shrubs and tree seedlings. For. Ecol. Manage. 49:267-275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(92)90140-575. · DOI
  26. Ricketts, T. H., E. Dinerstein, D. M. Olson, C. J. Loucks, W. Eichbaum, D. DellaSalla, K. Kavanagh, P. Hedao, P. Hurley, K. Carney, R. Abell, and S. Walters. 1999. Terrestrial Ecoregions of North America: A Conservation Assessment. Island Press, Washington DC. 508p.
  27. Riitters, K., J. Wickham, R. O'Neill, B. Jones, and E. Smith. 2000. Global-scale patterns of forest fragmentation. Conservation Ecol. 4(2):3. [online] http://www.consecol.org/vol4/iss2/art3/
  28. Schor, H. J., and D. H. Gray. 2007. Landforming: An Environmental Approach to Hillside Development, Mine Reclamation and Watershed Protection. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 347 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470259900. SMCRA. 2006. Public Law 95-87: Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977. US Code, Title 30, Chapter 25. Washington, DC. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/30/usc_sup_01_30_10_25_20_V.html · DOI
  29. Taylor, T. J., C. T. Agouridis, R. C. Warner and C. D. Barton. 2009. Runoff curve numbers for loose- dumped spoil in the Cumberland Plateau of Eastern Kentucky. Intl. J. Mining, Reclamat. and Environ. 23(2):103-120. DOI: 10.1080/17480930802176389. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17480930802176389. · DOI · Paper page
  30. Torbert, J. L., A. R. Tuladhar, J. A. Burger, and J. C. Bell. 1988. Minesoil property effects on the height of ten-year-old white pine. J. Environ. Qual. 17:189-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/jeq1988.00472425001700020004x92. · DOI
  31. Wickam, J. D., K. Riitters, T. Wade, M. Coan, and C. Homer. 2007. The effect of Appalachian mountaintop mining on interior forest. Landscape Ecol. 22:179-187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10980-006-9040-z. · DOI
  32. In W. L. Daniels, J. A. Burger, and C. E. Zipper (ed.). Proc., 13th Natl. Mtg., Amer. Soc. for Surface Mining and Reclamat., Princeton, WV.
  33. Wood, P. B., S. BB. Bosworth, and R. Dettmers. 2006. Cerulean warbler abundance and occurrence relative to large-scale edge and habitat characteristics. The Condor 108:154-165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1650/0010-5422(2006)108[0154:CWAAOR]2.0.CO;2. · DOI
  34. Zipper, C. E., J. A. Burger, J. G. Skousen, P. Angel, C. D. Barton, V. Davis, and J. Franklin. Restoring forests and associated ecosystem services on Appalachian coal surface mines. Environmental Management (in press). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-011-9670-z · DOI · Paper page
  35. Zonnveld, I. S. 1990. Scope and concepts of landscape ecology as an emerging science. p. 2-20. In I. S. Zonneveld and R. T. T. Forman (Eds.). Changing Landscapes: An Ecological Perspective. Springer-Verlag, New York. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3304-6_1. https://doi.org/10.21000/ · DOI

Authors
Burger, J. A.
Affiliations
Virginia Tech (US)
Corresponding author
Burger, J. A.
Venue
Journal American Society of Mining and Reclamation
Published
2011-06-30
Volume
2011
Issue
1
Pages
113-141
ISSN
2328-8744 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2316339765
Cited by
23
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
FWCI
8.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal American Society of Mining and Reclamation (publishedVersion)
Funders
Murdoch University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Geology and Environmental Impact Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Mine drainage and remediation techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Seedling growth and survival studies
Keywords
mine reclamation, coal mining, forest restoration, grassland reclamation, Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act, adaptive management, watershed protection, native species restoration, carbon sequestration, biodiversity, social license to operate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review