SUSTAINABLE MINED LAND RECLAMATION IN THE EASTERN U. S. COALFIELDS: A CASE FOR AN ECOSYSTEM RECLAMATION APPROACH
Open accessAbstract
The demand for energy throughout the world grows each day, and coal will be needed to meet a large portion of that demand.Coal mining techniques in the Appalachian and Midwestern coalfields have evolved to mine larger land areas and multiple seams at greater depths.New reclamation methods and approaches also must evolve to minimize cumulative impacts on aquatic, terrestrial, and human resources.Mined land reforestation practices over the past 80 years illustrate the evolution of reclamation in the eastern coalfields of the U. S. Prior to the implementation of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act (SMCRA), tree planting was synonymous with reclamation.Grassland reclamation became the dominant approach post-SMCRA.As stakeholders of the mining and reclamation process have begun to appreciate the value of forest ecosystems, there is greater emphasis on ensuring land and forest restoration and proper ecosystem functioning on reclaimed mined land.A forestry reclamation approach is supplanting grassland reclamation where forests are the logical postmining land use.Restoring forestland capability, native species, and watershed protection are positive outcomes.However, greater public demand for stream protection, water quality, biodiversity, carbon sequestration, native wildlife habitat, and human protection may require a more comprehensive ecosystem reclamation approach.In my view, the components of such an approach already have a good basis in science and could be applied through a process of adaptive management in the event such an approach is needed to help the coal industry in the U. S. maintain its social license to operate.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The stability of dumping depends on topsoil dumping techniques or geomorphic landform design.
“The stability of dumping depends on topsoil dumping techniques or geomorphic landform design (Topp et al., 2010;Burger, 2011).”
From Effects of surface coal mining and land reclamation on soil properties: A review (2019) · cites this paper as Burger, 2011
In “Improved Reclamation Approaches” (page unavailable), Burger proposes geomorphic landscape design to create stable slopes resistant to erosion and mass wasting. The section discusses placing salvaged topsoil to restore biodiversity and support deep-rooted trees, but does not link topsoil dumping techniques to the stability of dumped material. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredLoosely placing RMS restores hydrologic flow paths, allowing water infiltration, storage, drainage, and groundwater recharge.
“For the maintenance of hydrological stability, loosely placing RMS restores hydrologic flow paths, allowing water infiltration, storage, drainage, and groundwater recharge (Burger, 2011).”
From Effects of surface coal mining and land reclamation on soil properties: A review (2019) · cites this paper as Burger, 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Survival and growth of hardwoods in brown versus gray sandstone on a surface mine in West Virginia
Emerson, P., Skousen, J., & Ziemkiewicz, P. (2009) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2008.0479 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- Amichev, B. Y., J. A.,Burger, and J. A. Rodrigue. 2008. Carbon sequestration by forests and soils on mined land in the Midwestern and Appalachian coalfields of the U.S. Forest Ecology and Management 256:1949-1959. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.07.020 · DOI
- Anderson, B. W. and R. D. Ohmart, 1985. Riparian revegetation as a mitigating process in stream and river restoration. p. 41-80. In: J. Gore (ed.). The Restoration of Rivers and Streams, Butterworth, Boston, Massachusetts.
- Ayres, B., B. Dobchuk, D. Christensen, M. O'Kane, and M. Fawcett. 2006. Incorporation of natural slope features into the design of final landforms for waste rock stockpiles. 7th International Conference on Acid Rock Drainage, 2006 pp 59-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.21000/jasmr06020059.. · DOI
- Baker, K. L. 2009. Costs of reclamation on southern Appalachian coal mines: A cost-effectiveness analysis for reforestation versus hayland/pasture reclamation. M.S. Thesis. Virginia Tech, Blacksburg.
- Bernhardt, E. S., and M. A. Palmer. 2011. The environmental costs of mountaintop mining valley fill operations for aquatic ecosystems of the Central Appalachians. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1223:39-57/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.05986.x · DOI
- Burger, J. A. 1997. Conceptual framework for monitoring the impacts of intensive forest management on sustainable forestry. In Hakkila, P., Heino, M., E. Puranen, E. (Eds.), Forest Management for Bioenergy. The Finnish Forest Research Institute, Vantaa Research Centre, Res. Pap. 640, pp. 147-156.
- Burger, J. A., D. O. Mitchem, C. E. Zipper, and R. Williams. 2008. Hardwood reforestation for Phase III bond release: Need for reduced ground cover. Proceedings America Society of Mining and Reclamation, 2008 pp 192-205. http://dx.doi.org/10.21000/JASMR08010192. · DOI
- Brundtland, G. H. (ed.). 1987. Our Common Future: The World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Costanza, R. R. d'Arge, R. de Groot, S. Farber, M. Grasso, B. Hannon, K. Limburg, S. Naeem, R.V. O'Neill, J. Paruelo, R. G. Raskin, P. Sutton, and M. VandenBelt. 1997. The value of the World's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253-260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/387253a0. · DOI · Paper page
- Cowell, S. J., W. Wehrmeyer, P. W. Argust, and G. S. Robertson. 1999. Sustainability and the primary extraction industries: theories and practice. Resources Policy 25:277-286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4207(00)00003-9. · DOI
- Davis, G. (ed.). 1965. A guide for revegetating bituminous strip-mine spoils in Pennsylvania. USDA Forest Service. 46 p. Doolittle, W. T. 1958. Site index comparisons for several forest species in the Southern Appalachians. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 22:450-458. http://dx.doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1958.03615995002200050023x. · DOI
- Fields-Johnson, C., C. E. Zipper, J. A. Burger, and D. M. Evans. 2010. Second year response of Appalachian mixed hardwoods to soil surface grading and herbaceous ground cover on reclaimed mine land. Proceedings America Society of Mining and Reclamation, 2010 305-318. http://dx.doi.org/10.21000/JASMR1001030518. · DOI
- Fritz, K. M., S. Fulton, B. R. Johnson, C. C. Barton, J. D. Jack, D. A. Word, and R. A. Burke. 2010. Structural and functional characteristics of natural and constructed channels draining a reclaimed mountaintop removal and valley fill coal mine. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 29:673-689. http://dx.doi.org/10.1899/09-060. · DOI
- Heal, G. 2000. Nature and the marketplace: Capturing the value of ecosystem services. Island Press. Washington, DC. 195 p.
- Holl, K. D. 2002. Long-term vegetation recovery on reclaimed coal surface mines in the eastern USA. J. Appl. Ecol. 39:960-970. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2002.00767.x. · DOI
- Humphreys, D. 2001. Sustainable development: Can the mining industry afford it? Resources Policy 27:1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4207(01)00003-4. · DOI
- In J. E. Brandt (ed.). Proc., 14th Natl. Mtg., Amer. Soc. for Surface Mining and Reclamation, Princeton, WV.
- Kurlander, L. T. 2001. Newmont Mining: The social license to operate. Global Executive Forum. Univ. of Colorado, Inst. for Intl. Business and Center for Intl. Business Educ. and Res. https://doi.org/10.21000/JASMR97010344 · DOI
- McCart, G. D. (ed.). 1973. Guidelines for reclamation and revegetation surface-mined coal areas in southwest Virginia. Extension Division, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg. MA-142.
- McComb W. C., K. McGarigal, J. D. Fraser, and W. H. Davis. 1989. Planning for basin-level cumulative effects in the Appalachian coal field. Trans. 54 th N. Amer Wildland and Natural Resour. Conf. 54:102-112.
- Michael, P. R., M. J. Superfesky, and L. J. Uranowski. 2010. Challenges to applying geomorphic and stream reclamation methodologies to mountaintop mining and excess spoil fill construction in steep-slope topography (e.g. Central Appalachia), Proceedings America Society of Mining and Reclamation, 2010 pp 610-634. http://dx.doi.org/10.21000/JASMR10010610 · DOI
- Mudd, G. M. 2010. The environmental sustainability of mining in Australia: Key mega-trends and looming constraints. Resources Policy 35:98-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2009.12.001 · DOI
- Orndorff, Z., W. L. Daniels, M. Beck, and M. Eick. 2010. Leaching potentials of coal spoil and refuse: Acid-base interactions and electrical conductivity, Proceedings America Society of Mining and Reclamation, 2010 pp 736-766. http://dx.doi.org/10.21000/JASMR10010736 · DOI
- Palmer, M. A., E. S. Bernhard, W. H. Schlesinger, K. N. Eshelman, E. Foufoula-Georgiou, M. S. Hendryx, A. D. Lemly, G. E. Likens, O. L. Loucks, M.E. Power, P. S. White, and P. R. Wilcock. 2010. Mountaintop mining consequences. Science 327:148-149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1180543 · DOI
- Putz, F. E., and C. D. Canham. 1992. Mechanisms of arrested succession in shrublands: root and shoot competition between shrubs and tree seedlings. For. Ecol. Manage. 49:267-275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(92)90140-575. · DOI
- Ricketts, T. H., E. Dinerstein, D. M. Olson, C. J. Loucks, W. Eichbaum, D. DellaSalla, K. Kavanagh, P. Hedao, P. Hurley, K. Carney, R. Abell, and S. Walters. 1999. Terrestrial Ecoregions of North America: A Conservation Assessment. Island Press, Washington DC. 508p.
- Riitters, K., J. Wickham, R. O'Neill, B. Jones, and E. Smith. 2000. Global-scale patterns of forest fragmentation. Conservation Ecol. 4(2):3. [online] http://www.consecol.org/vol4/iss2/art3/
- Schor, H. J., and D. H. Gray. 2007. Landforming: An Environmental Approach to Hillside Development, Mine Reclamation and Watershed Protection. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 347 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470259900. SMCRA. 2006. Public Law 95-87: Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977. US Code, Title 30, Chapter 25. Washington, DC. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/30/usc_sup_01_30_10_25_20_V.html · DOI
- Taylor, T. J., C. T. Agouridis, R. C. Warner and C. D. Barton. 2009. Runoff curve numbers for loose- dumped spoil in the Cumberland Plateau of Eastern Kentucky. Intl. J. Mining, Reclamat. and Environ. 23(2):103-120. DOI: 10.1080/17480930802176389. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17480930802176389. · DOI · Paper page
- Torbert, J. L., A. R. Tuladhar, J. A. Burger, and J. C. Bell. 1988. Minesoil property effects on the height of ten-year-old white pine. J. Environ. Qual. 17:189-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/jeq1988.00472425001700020004x92. · DOI
- Wickam, J. D., K. Riitters, T. Wade, M. Coan, and C. Homer. 2007. The effect of Appalachian mountaintop mining on interior forest. Landscape Ecol. 22:179-187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10980-006-9040-z. · DOI
- In W. L. Daniels, J. A. Burger, and C. E. Zipper (ed.). Proc., 13th Natl. Mtg., Amer. Soc. for Surface Mining and Reclamat., Princeton, WV.
- Wood, P. B., S. BB. Bosworth, and R. Dettmers. 2006. Cerulean warbler abundance and occurrence relative to large-scale edge and habitat characteristics. The Condor 108:154-165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1650/0010-5422(2006)108[0154:CWAAOR]2.0.CO;2. · DOI
- Zipper, C. E., J. A. Burger, J. G. Skousen, P. Angel, C. D. Barton, V. Davis, and J. Franklin. Restoring forests and associated ecosystem services on Appalachian coal surface mines. Environmental Management (in press). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-011-9670-z · DOI · Paper page
- Zonnveld, I. S. 1990. Scope and concepts of landscape ecology as an emerging science. p. 2-20. In I. S. Zonneveld and R. T. T. Forman (Eds.). Changing Landscapes: An Ecological Perspective. Springer-Verlag, New York. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3304-6_1. https://doi.org/10.21000/ · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Effects of surface coal mining and land reclamation on soil properties: A review
Feng, Y., Wang, J., Bai, Z., & Reading, L. (2019) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.02.015 · Cited by 501 · see citing works
Swab, R. M., Lorenz, N., Byrd, S., & Dick, R. (2017) · Ecological Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.05.012 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Bauman, J. M., Keiffer, C. H., & McCarthy, B. C. (2014) · New Forests · doi:10.1007/s11056-014-9439-3 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
- Authors
- Burger, J. A.
- Affiliations
- Virginia Tech (US)
- Corresponding author
- Burger, J. A.
- Venue
- Journal American Society of Mining and Reclamation
- Published
- 2011-06-30
- Volume
- 2011
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 113-141
- ISSN
- 2328-8744 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2316339765
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 8.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal American Society of Mining and Reclamation (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Murdoch University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Geology and Environmental Impact Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Mine drainage and remediation techniques
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Seedling growth and survival studies
- Keywords
- mine reclamation, coal mining, forest restoration, grassland reclamation, Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act, adaptive management, watershed protection, native species restoration, carbon sequestration, biodiversity, social license to operate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review