Cited by 26Seedling growth and survival studiesForest ecology and managementForest Insect Ecology and Management

Growth performance and chestnut blight incidence (Cryphonectria parasitica) of backcrossed chestnut seedlings in surface mine restoration

Bauman, Jenise M., Keiffer, Carolyn Howes, McCarthy, Brian C.·2014·New Forests

Abstract

Anthropogenic disturbances such as mining for coal have caused significant disturbance to the Appalachian forests of North America. Recovery of these disturbances is highly dependent on restoration methods that encourage natural succession. Unfortunately, current reclamation protocols have resulted in soil compaction and aggressive herbaceous groundcovers that impede the recovery of native trees. To overcome this, methods such as deep ripping and plow and disking were applied to a reclaimed mine land in Ohio, USA Plantings of pure American chestnut (Castanea dentata) and two seedling types (BC₁F₃ and BC₂F₃) bred for resistance to chestnut blight fungus (Cryphonectria parasitica) were assessed among different soil preparation treatments over five field seasons. Seedling mortality due to natural infection by chestnut blight was recorded and related to the disease resistance potential of the BC₁F₃ and BC₂F₃ seedlings. The growth and survival of chestnuts in plots that employed either ripping, plow disking, or the combination of the two methods were significantly greater than the control plots. After five seasons, differences existed among the soil treatments; plots that applied deep ripping had the highest survival and growth. When chestnut types were compared, pure American chestnut was the tallest. However, BC₂F₃ chestnut seedlings had the highest survival and lower disease incidence. Results suggest that employing deep ripping with backcrossed chestnut seedlings provides a method for establishing hardwood seedlings in soils impacted by surface mining. Planting methods that promote vigorous growth can be applied more broadly to other regions where anthropogenic disturbances create soil conditions that hinder seedling establishment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11056-014-9439-3

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This study and others demonstrate the potential of these chestnut stock types to survive and persist, and thereby spread gradually into eastern North American forests by restoration efforts on reclaimed surface mines in Appalachia.

    “This study and others demonstrate the potential of these chestnut stock types to survive and persist, and thereby spread gradually into eastern North American forests by restoration efforts on reclaimed surface mines in Appalachia (Barton et al. 2015; Bauman et al. 2014; Fields-Johnson et al. 2010, and herein).”
  • Bauman et al. (2014) reported that chestnut seedlings were 150-180 cm tall after 5 years in Indiana mine soils.

    “Bauman et al. (2014) reported that chestnut seedlings were 150–180 cm tall after 5 years in Indiana mine soils, much taller than the chestnuts growing in this West Virginia study.”
  • Chestnuts in this West Virginia study were much shorter than the 150-180 cm reported by Bauman et al. (2014) after 5 years in Indiana mine soils.

    “Bauman et al. (2014) reported that chestnut seedlings were 150–180 cm tall after 5 years in Indiana mine soils, much taller than the chestnuts growing in this West Virginia study.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bauman, J. M., Keiffer, C. H., & McCarthy, B. C.
Affiliations
  • Western Washington University (US)
  • Miami University (US)
  • Ohio University (US)
Corresponding author
Bauman, Jenise M.
Venue
New Forests
Published
2014-06-11
Volume
45
Issue
6
Pages
813-828
ISSN
  • 0169-4286 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-5095
OpenAlex
W1967959204
Cited by
26
References
64
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4
FWCI
2.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
New Forests (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture
  • West Virginia University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Seedling growth and survival studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Forest ecology and management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Forest Insect Ecology and Management
Keywords
American chestnut, Castanea dentata, chestnut blight, Cryphonectria parasitica, disease resistance, surface mine reclamation, subsoiling, soil compaction, seedling establishment, seedling growth and survival, Appalachian forests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review