The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Culture: An Empirical Investigation of Beliefs, Work, and Fertility
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1257/mac.1.1.146 · Paper page
Abstract
We study the effect of culture on important economic outcomes by using the 1970 census to examine the work and fertility behavior of women born in the U.S. but whose parents were born elsewhere.We use past female labor force participation and total fertility rates from the country of ancestry as our cultural proxies.These variables should capture, in addition to past economic and institutional conditions, the beliefs commonly held about the role of women in society (i.e., culture).Given the different time and place, only the beliefs embodied in the cultural proxies should be potentially relevant.We show that these cultural proxies have positive and significant explanatory power for individual work and fertility outcomes, even after controlling for possible indirect effects of culture.We examine alternative hypotheses for these positive correlations and show that neither unobserved human capital nor networks are likely to be responsible.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-2454 · Cited by 28,789
Institutions as the Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. (2004) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w10481 · Cited by 3,101
Monitoring the world economy, 1820-1992
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-2851 · Cited by 2,413
Greif, A. (1994) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261959 · Cited by 2,384
De gustibus non est disputandum
Stigler, G. J., & Becker, G. S. (2010) · Idées économiques et sociales · doi:10.3917/idee.159.0054 · Cited by 2,282
Schooling, Labor-Force Quality, and the Growth of Nations
Hanushek, E. A., & Kimko, D. D. (2000) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.90.5.1184 · Cited by 2,164
Social Norms and Economic Theory
Elster, J. (1989) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.3.4.99 · Cited by 2,071
The wealth and poverty of nations: why some are so rich and some so poor
(1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-5770 · Cited by 1,913
Religion and Economic Growth across Countries
Barro, R. J., & McCleary, R. M. (2003) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240306800505 · Cited by 1,445
The Wealth and Poverty of Nations
Rosen, G. (1999) · Journal of Economic Issues · doi:10.1080/00213624.1999.11506142 · Cited by 1,237
Cited by
Global Evidence on Economic Preferences*
Falk, A., Becker, A., Dohmen, T., Enke, B., Huffman, D., & Sunde, U. (2018) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjy013 · Cited by 1,724
The Importance of History for Economic Development
Nunn, N. (2009) · Annual Review of Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev.economics.050708.143336 · Cited by 698
Corruption culture and corporate misconduct
Liu, X. (2016) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.06.005 · Cited by 580
Child‐Care Availability and Fertility in Norway
Rindfuss, R. R., Guilkey, D. K., Morgan, S. P., & Kravdal, Ø. (2010) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00355.x · Cited by 326
Alesina, A., & Giuliano, P. (2007) · doi:10.3386/w13051 · Cited by 117
Metadata
- Authors
- Fogli, A., & Fernandez, 1.
- Publisher
- Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis
- Published
- 2005-04
- OpenAlex
- W2111796785
- Cited by
- 419
- References
- 45
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Culture: An Empirical Investigation of Beliefs, Work, and Fertility. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.21034/sr.361
- The paper
- Fogli, A., & Fernandez, 1. (2005). Culture: An Empirical Investigation of Beliefs, Work, and Fertility. https://doi.org/10.21034/sr.361
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.