The DOI matches its Crossref record.
De gustibus non est disputandum
Abstract
Dans la microéconomie standard, les préférences du consommateur sont considérées comme des données (variable exogène). George Stigler et Gary Becker cherchent ici à endogénéiser ces préférences, ce qui les place alors sur un des terrains favoris des sociologues : l’analyse des goûts. Notre collègue Christophe Longuet nous offre une traduction inédite de cet article canonique précédée d’une présentation. Son travail, en tout point remarquable, vous sera certainement très utile.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Social Theory of International Politics
Wendt, A. (1999) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511612183 · Cited by 7,664
Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making
Frederick, S. (2005) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/089533005775196732 · Cited by 5,256
Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory
Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2011) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x10000968 · Cited by 2,254
RATIONALITY AS PROCESS AND AS PRODUCT OF THOUGHT
Simon, H. A. (1988) · Decision Making · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511598951.005 · Cited by 1,771
Collective Identity Formation and the International State
Wendt, A. (1994) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2944711 · Cited by 1,575
Metadata
- Authors
- Stigler, G. J., & Becker, G. S.
- Venue
- Idées économiques et sociales
- Publisher
- CAIRN
- Published
- 2010-03-01
- Volume
- N° 159
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 54-69
- ISSN
- 2257-5111 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2165773602
- Cited by
- 2,282
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 280.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- fr
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: De gustibus non est disputandum. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3917/idee.159.0054
- The paper
- Stigler, G. J., & Becker, G. S. (2010). De gustibus non est disputandum. Idées économiques et sociales. https://doi.org/10.3917/idee.159.0054
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
