The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Preliminary study to identify severe from moderate cases of COVID-19 using combined hematology parameters
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The third fatal coronavirus is the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) that causes novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) which first broke out in December 2019. Patients will develop rapidly if there is no any intervention, so the risk identification of severe patients is critical. The aim of this study was to investigate the characteristics and rules of hematology changes in patients with COVID-19, and to explore the possibility differentiating moderate and severe patients using conventional hematology parameters or combined parameters. METHODS: The clinical data of 45 moderate and severe type patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections in Jingzhou Central Hospital from January 23 to February 13, 2020 were collected. The epidemiological indexes, clinical symptoms, and laboratory test results of the patients were retrospectively analyzed. Those parameters with significant differences between moderate and severe cases were analyzed, and the combination parameters with the best diagnostic performance were selected using the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) method. RESULTS: Of the 45 patients with the novel 2019 corona virus (COVID-19) (35 moderate and 10 severe cases), 23 were male and 22 were female, with ages ranging from 16 to 62 years. The most common clinical symptoms were fever (89%) and dry cough (60%). As the disease progressed, white blood cell count (WBC), neutrophil count, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), red blood cell distribution width-coefficient of variation (RDW-CV), and red cell volume distribution width-standard deviation (RDW-SD) parameters in the severe group were significantly higher than those in the moderate group (P<0.05); meanwhile, lymphocyte count (Lym#), eosinophil count (Eos#), high fluorescent cell percentage (HFC%), red blood cell count (RBC), hemoglobin (HGB), and hematocrit (HCT) parameters in the severe group were significantly lower than those in the moderate group (P<0.05). For NLR parameter, it's area under the curve (AUC), cutoff, sensitivity and specificity were 0.890, 13.39, 83.3% and 82.4% respectively; meanwhile, for PLR parameter, it's AUC, cutoff, sensitivity and specificity were 0.842, 267.03, 83.3% and 74.0% respectively. The combined parameters of NLR and RDW-SD had the best diagnostic efficiency (AUC =0.938), and when the cutoff value was 1.046, the sensitivity and the specificity were 90.0% and 84.7% respectively, followed by the combined parameter NLR&RDW-CV (AUC =0.923). When the cut-off value was 0.62, the sensitivity and the specificity for distinguishing severe type from moderate cases of COVID-19 were 90.0% and 82.4% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The combined NLR and RDW-SD parameter is the best hematology index. It may help clinicians to predict the severity of COVID-19 patients and can be used as a useful indicator to help prevent and control the epidemic.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chen, N., Zhou, M., Dong, X., Qu, J., Gong, F., Han, Y., Qiu, Y., Wang, J., Liu, Y., Wei, Y., et al. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30211-7 · Cited by 21,415
Self-citationIdentification of a novel coronavirus in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome
Drosten, C., Günther, S., Preiser, W., van der Werf, S., Brodt, H.-R., Becker, S., Rabenau, H., Panning, M., Kolesnikova, L., Fouchier, R. A. M., et al. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa030747 · Cited by 4,574
Assiri, A., Al-Tawfiq, J. A., Al-Rabeeah, A. A., Al-Rabiah, F. A., Al-Hajjar, S., Al-Barrak, A., Flemban, H., Al-Nassir, W. N., Balkhy, H. H., Al-Hakeem, R. F., et al. (2013) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(13)70204-4 · Cited by 1,435
Return of the Coronavirus: 2019-nCoV
Gralinski, L. E., & Menachery, V. D. (2020) · Viruses · doi:10.3390/v12020135 · Cited by 1,348
Responding to Covid-19 — A Once-in-a-Century Pandemic?
Gates, B. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp2003762 · Cited by 1,076
Cited by
Chan, J. F.-W., Yuan, S., Kok, K.-H., To, K. K.-W., Chu, H., Yang, J., Xing, F., Liu, J., Yip, C. C.-Y., Poon, R. W.-S., et al. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30154-9 · Cited by 8,944
Wynants, L., Van Calster, B., Bonten, M. M., Collins, G. S., Debray, T. P., De Vos, M., Haller, M. C., Heinze, G., Moons, K. G., Riley, R. D., et al. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.03.24.20041020 · Cited by 3,070
Li, X., Liu, C., Mao, Z., Xiao, M., Wang, L., Qi, S., & Zhou, F. (2020) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/s13054-020-03374-8 · Cited by 380
Foy, B. H., Carlson, J. C. T., Reinertsen, E., Padros I. Valls, R., Pallares Lopez, R., Palanques-Tost, E., Mow, C., Westover, M. B., Aguirre, A. D., & Higgins, J. M. (2020) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.22058 · Cited by 319
Emerging Telemedicine Tools for Remote COVID-19 Diagnosis, Monitoring, and Management
Lukas, H., Xu, C., Yu, Y., & Gao, W. (2020) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.0c08494 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, C., Deng, R., Gou, L., Fu, Z., Zhang, X., Shao, F., Wang, G., Fu, W., Xiao, J., Ding, X., Li, T., Xiao, X., & Li, C.
- Venue
- Annals of Translational Medicine
- Publisher
- AME Publishing Company
- Published
- 2020-05
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 593-593
- ISSN
- 2305-5839 (ISSN-L)
- 2305-5847
- OpenAlex
- W3024667763
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 5.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preliminary study to identify severe from moderate cases of COVID-19 using combined hematology parameters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.21037/atm-20-3391
- The paper
- Wang, C., Deng, R., Gou, L., Fu, Z., Zhang, X., Shao, F., Wang, G., Fu, W., Xiao, J., Ding, X., Li, T., Xiao, X., & Li, C. (2020). Preliminary study to identify severe from moderate cases of COVID-19 using combined hematology parameters. Annals of Translational Medicine. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-3391
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.