Cited by 45Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationSpine and Intervertebral Disc PathologyAnesthesia and Pain Management

Influence of psychosocial distress in the results of elective lumbar spine surgery

Open access
Amaral, Vivian, Marchi, Luis, Martim, Heber, Amaral, Rodrigo, Nogueira-Neto, Joes, Pierro, Ellen, Oliveira, Leonardo, Coutinho, Etevaldo +4 more·2017·Journal of Spine Surgery

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low back pain can be caused by several pathological entities and its perception can be altered by external factors, for example by some psychological and social factors. The objective of this study was to compare surgical outcomes in patients with or without psychosocial issues. METHODS: Single center, retrospective and comparative study. Patients with indication to elective lumbar spine surgery were screened for some psychosocial factors. As a result of the screening, patients were divided in two groups: mild psychosocial issues (green group) or moderate psychosocial issues (yellow group). The groups were compared using the following variables: demographic and clinical history, depression (HAD-D), anxiety (HAD-A), pain levels [visual analogue scale (VAS)], disability [Oswestry disability index (ODI)] and quality of life [EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D)] at preop and 6-12 months follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 136 patients were included (51% female) in this study. The 62.5% were allocated at the green group, and 37.5% in the yellow group. Similar pain levels were observed at preop, but the green group evolved with superior improvement in pain levels after surgery (P=0.003). In the ODI and EQ-5D scales, the green group had already shown lower clinical disability at preop (P=0.009 and P=0.003, respectively) and evolved with better outcomes at the final evaluation (P=0.049 and P=0.017). VAS, ODI and EQ-5D scores improved from baseline similarly in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Presurgical screening identify the presence of psychological distress. Psychosocial factors are correlated with poorer clinical outcomes, both in the baseline and after the surgery. Despite the differences between found, even patients with mild psychosocial impairment can experience clinical improvement with surgery.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21037/jss.2017.08.05

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amaral, V., Marchi, L., Martim, H., Amaral, R., Nogueira-Neto, J., Pierro, E., Oliveira, L., Coutinho, E., Marcelino, F., Faulhaber, N., Jensen, R., & Pimenta, L.
Affiliations
  • Instituto de Patologia da Coluna (BR)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Venue
Journal of Spine Surgery
Published
2017-09
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
371-378
ISSN
  • 2414-4630 (ISSN-L)
  • 2414-469X
OpenAlex
W2753578152
Cited by
45
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of Spine Surgery (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
Keywords
psychosocial distress, low back pain, surgical outcomes, depression, anxiety, Oswestry Disability Index, quality of life, disability, psychological factors in pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review