Cited by 4Innovations in Medical EducationSurgical Simulation and TrainingHospital Admissions and Outcomes

Completeness of training in thoracic surgery: the perfect operative log book

Open access
Batirel, Hasan Fevzi·2019·Journal of Thoracic Disease

Abstract

One of the most important and difficult aspect of surgical training is to assess the competence of a trainee. Miller’s pyramid of clinical competence in surgery has been described as a ladder which starts with knowledge, followed by understanding of the pathophysiology (1). Then the trainee is expected to show how the procedure can be performed and then actually performs the procedure under the guidance or assistance of a mentor.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21037/jtd.2019.04.61

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Miller's Pyramid of Clinical Competence serves as a valuable framework, emphasizing progression through four levels: 'knows,' 'knows how,' 'shows how,' and 'does.'

    “Miller's Pyramid of Clinical Competence [49,50] serves as a valuable framework, emphasizing progression through four levels: 'knows,' 'knows how,' 'shows how,' and 'does.'”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Halsted WS. The training of the surgeon. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp 1904;15:267-75.
  2. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Case Requirements for Residents Beginning on or after July 1, 2017. Review Committee for Thoracic Surgery.
  3. Klepetko W, Aberg TH, Lerut AE, et al. Structure of general thoracic surgery in Europe. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001;20:663-8.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Batirel, H. F.
Venue
Journal of Thoracic Disease
Published
2019-04
Volume
11
Issue
S7
Pages
S1014-S1017
ISSN
  • 2072-1439 (ISSN-L)
  • 2077-6624
OpenAlex
W2941816666
Cited by
4
References
12
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of Thoracic Disease (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dspace Repository (Marmara Üniversitesi) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Dspace Repository (Marmara Üniversitesi) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Simulation and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
Keywords
thoracic surgery training, surgical skill assessment, surgical training, trainee assessment, mentoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review