Cited by 0Chaos-based Image/Signal EncryptionComputer Science and EngineeringAdvanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques

Medical image encryption algorithm based on Chen’s chaotic system and the Advanced Encryption Standard algorithm

Open access
Hekim, Arzigul, Yunus, Mamatreyim, Huang, Qingmei, Mamatreyim, Nadira, Imin, Aliya, Turhun, Dilara, Sulayman, Ablat, Sattar, Mutallip·2026·Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery

Abstract

Background: Single Chen's chaotic system or Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) cannot provide sufficient anti-attack performance when separately used for medical image encryption. This study built a hybrid encryption framework combining four-dimensional (4D) Chen hyperchaotic system, Arnold transform, logistic map and AES-256 to fix security flaws of single encryption modules and protect privacy of clinical medical imaging data. Methods: A three-stage encryption workflow driven by logistic chaotic sequences was designed: (I) the logistic map ran 4,300 iterations (initial X=0.1, μ: 3.57-4.00, step =0.0001). The 100th and 1000th sequence values were Arnold mapping parameters; the 1200th, 1500th, 1800th and 2000th outputs served as four initial states of the 4D Chen hyperchaotic system to guarantee high chaotic parameter sensitivity; (II) Arnold transform realized pixel scrambling, followed by exclusive-OR (XOR) diffusion with Chen hyperchaotic sequences to eliminate intra-image pixel correlation; (III) we extracted 256 continuous bits (positions 2050-2305) from logistic sequences as the unique AES-256 secret key, and implemented multiround block encryption under AES Electronic Codebook (ECB) mode to boost cipher randomness. Simulations were run on MATLAB R2019b with two self-generated medical phantom images: a 743×720 liver lesion phantom (46.1 kB) and a 236×180 splenic trauma phantom (24.6 kB). Results: ), proving uniform grayscale distribution. Ciphertext information entropy was 7.9953 (liver lesion phantom) and 7.9969 (splenic trauma phantom), nearly the ideal maximum of 8.00. Ciphertext pixel correlation coefficients (horizontal, vertical, diagonal) ranged -0.0042 to 0.0039, close to zero and far smaller than plaintext coefficients (>0.93). Compared with 2025-2026 state-of-the-art chaotic encryption schemes, our method achieved the best NPCR, UACI and correlation results. Extra tests confirmed strong resistance against chosen-plaintext, chosen-ciphertext, noise and occlusion attacks, with stable efficiency for computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound and X-ray multimodal medical images. Conclusions: The proposed linked chaotic-AES hybrid algorithm unifies Arnold parameters, Chen hyperchaotic initial values and AES keys via logistic mapping, overcoming drawbacks of independent random module design. It achieves near-ideal randomness, ultra-low pixel correlation and strong multi-attack resistance versus standalone Chen chaos or AES. This lightweight, low-overhead scheme provides reliable end-to-end security for clinical medical image transmission and storage in smart healthcare systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21037/qims-2026-0974

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Hekim, A., Yunus, M., Huang, Q., Mamatreyim, N., Imin, A., Turhun, D., Sulayman, A., & Sattar, M.
Affiliations
  • Xinjiang University of Finance and Economics (CN)
  • Xinjiang University (CN)
  • PetroChina Xinjiang Oilfield Company (China) (CN)
  • Xinjiang Academy of Animal Science (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Sulayman, Ablat
  • Sattar, Mutallip
Venue
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery
Published
2026-10
Volume
16
Issue
10
Pages
795-795
ISSN
  • 2223-4292 (ISSN-L)
  • 2223-4306
OpenAlex
W7214090662
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Computer Science and Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
Keywords
medical image encryption, Arnold transform, logistic map, AES-256, hybrid encryption, pixel scrambling, XOR diffusion, NPCR and UACI

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review