The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Integrating Occupational Safety and Health Information Into Vocational and Technical Education and Other Workforce Preparation Programs
Abstract
The high rates of injury among young workers are a pressing public health issue, especially given the demand of the job market for new workers. Young and new workers experience the highest rates of occupational injuries of any age group. Incorporating occupational safety and health (OSH) information into the more than 20 000 vocational and other workforce preparation programs in the United States might provide a mechanism for reducing work-related injuries and illnesses among young and new workers. We assessed the status of including OSH information or training in workforce preparation programs and found there is an inconsistent emphasis on OSH information.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cost-benefit analysis for high-risk industries of value adding to workers' safety knowledge, behaviour change and risk perceptions is crucial to risk mitigation and often mandatory.
“The cost-benefit analysis for these industries of ‘value adding’ to workers (especially inexperienced) safety knowledge, behaviour change and risk perceptions is crucial to risk mitigation and often mandatory [135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142].”
From What People Really Think About Safety around Horses: The Relationship between Risk Perception, Values and Safety Behaviours (2020) · cites this paper as [142]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- 10.1179/oeh.2004.10.1.90 · DOI
- 10.1002/ajim.4700270604 · DOI
- 10.1136/ip.4.3.211 · DOI
- 10.13031/2013.13001 · DOI
- 10.1300/J075v21n02_09 · DOI
- Perkins R. Evaluation of an Alaskan marine safety training program. Public Health Rep . 1995;110:701–702.
- 10.1097/00043764-200012000-00004 · DOI
- Birkner LR, Birkner RK. Creating value with health and safety. Occup Hazards . 1997;59:57–58. · DOI
- 10.1177/001979390005300203 · DOI
- 10.1002/ajim.10329 · DOI
- 10.2105/AJPH.85.4.590 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chapman, M., Thomas, M., & Thompson, K. (2020) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10122222 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Schulte, P. A., Stephenson, C. M., Okun, A. H., Palassis, J., & Biddle, E.
- Affiliations
- Paul A. Schulte, Carol Merry Stephenson, Andrea H. Okun, and John Palassis, are with the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Cincinnati, Ohio. Elyce Biddle is with the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Morgantown, WVa.
- Venue
- American Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- American Public Health Association
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 404-411
- ISSN
- 0090-0036
- 1541-0048
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
