The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ethical Goals of Community Consultation in Research
Open accessAbstract
In response to the traditional emphasis on the rights, interests, and well-being of individual research subjects, there has been growing attention focused on the importance of involving communities in research development and approval. Community consultation is a particularly common method of involving communities. However, the fundamental ethical goals of community consultation have not been delineated, which makes it difficult for investigators, sponsors, and institutional review boards to design and evaluate consultation efforts. Community consultation must be tailored to the communities in which it is conducted, but the purposes of consultation—the ethical goals it is designed to achieve—should be universal. We propose 4 ethical goals that give investigators, sponsors, institutional review boards, and communities a framework for evaluating community consultation processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
REVIEW OF COMMUNITY-BASED RESEARCH: Assessing Partnership Approaches to Improve Public Health
Israel, B. A., Schulz, A. J., Parker, E. A., & Becker, A. B. (1998) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173 · Cited by 5,893
Cited by
Acceptance, availability, and feasibility of RTS, S/AS01 malaria vaccine: A review
Mumtaz, H., Nadeem, A., Bilal, W., Ansar, F., Saleem, S., Khan, Q. A., Tango, T., Farkouh, C., Belay, N. F., Verma, R., et al. (2023) · Immunity, Inflammation and Disease · doi:10.1002/iid3.899 · Cited by 42
Marley, T. L. (2019) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764218799130 · Cited by 34
Nicholas, G., Bell, C., Coombe, R., Welch, J. R., Noble, B., Anderson, J., Bannister, K., & Watkins, J. (2010) · Heritage Management · doi:10.1179/hma.2010.3.1.117 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Dickert, N., & Sugarman, J.
- Venue
- American Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- American Public Health Association
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1123-1127
- ISSN
- 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0048
- OpenAlex
- W2104668123
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ethical Goals of Community Consultation in Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2105/ajph.2004.058933
- The paper
- Dickert, N., & Sugarman, J. (2005). Ethical Goals of Community Consultation in Research. American Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2004.058933
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
