The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Power and the Promise: Working With Communities to Analyze Data, Interpret Findings, and Get to Outcomes
Open accessAbstract
Although the intent of community-based participatory research (CBPR) is to include community voices in all phases of a research initiative, community partners appear less frequently engaged in data analysis and interpretation than in other research phases. Using 4 brief case studies, each with a different data collection methodology, we provide examples of how community members participated in data analysis, interpretation, or both, thereby strengthening community capacity and providing unique insight. The roles and skills of the community and academic partners were different from but complementary to each other. We suggest that including community partners in data analysis and interpretation, while lengthening project time, enriches insights and findings and consequently should be a focus of the next generation of CBPR initiatives.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
REVIEW OF COMMUNITY-BASED RESEARCH: Assessing Partnership Approaches to Improve Public Health
Israel, B. A., Schulz, A. J., Parker, E. A., & Becker, A. B. (1998) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173 · Cited by 5,893
Self-citationCodebook Development for Team-Based Qualitative Analysis
MacQueen, K. M., McLellan, E., Kay, K., & Milstein, B. (1998) · CAM Journal · doi:10.1177/1525822x980100020301 · Cited by 1,675
Cited by
Wallerstein, N., & Duran, B. (2010) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2009.184036 · Cited by 2,318
Self-citationBrett, J., Staniszewska, S., Mockford, C., Herron‐Marx, S., Hughes, J., Tysall, C., & Suleman, R. (2014) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00795.x · Cited by 1,598
Participatory Research Methods – Choice Points in the Research Process
Vaughn, L. M., & Jacquez, F. (2020) · Journal of Participatory Research Methods · doi:10.35844/001c.13244 · Cited by 871
Community-Based Participatory Research From the Margin to the Mainstream: Are Researchers Prepared?
Horowitz, C. R., Robinson, M., & Seifer, S. (2009) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.107.729863 · Cited by 549
Frank, L., Forsythe, L., Ellis, L., Schrandt, S., Sheridan, S., Gerson, J., Konopka, K., & Daugherty, S. (2015) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-014-0893-3 · Cited by 288
Metadata
- Authors
- Cashman, S. B., Adeky, S., Allen, A. J., Corburn, J., Israel, B. A., Montaño, J., Rafelito, A., Rhodes, S. D., Swanston, S., Wallerstein, N., & Eng, E.
- Venue
- American Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- American Public Health Association
- Published
- 2008-08
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1407-1417
- ISSN
- 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0048
- OpenAlex
- W2124136357
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 30.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Power and the Promise: Working With Communities to Analyze Data, Interpret Findings, and Get to Outcomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2105/ajph.2007.113571
- The paper
- Cashman, S. B., Adeky, S., Allen, A. J., Corburn, J., Israel, B. A., Montaño, J., Rafelito, A., Rhodes, S. D., Swanston, S., Wallerstein, N., & Eng, E. (2008). The Power and the Promise: Working With Communities to Analyze Data, Interpret Findings, and Get to Outcomes. American Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2007.113571
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
