Cited by 85Educational Technology in LearningOnline and Blended LearningInnovative Teaching Methods

Using Seminar Blogs to Enhance Student Participation and Learning in Public Health School Classes

Open access
Goldman, Rose H., Cohen, Amy P., Sheahan, Fred·2008·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Objectives. We evaluated whether “seminar blogs” enhanced learning in a large graduate-level introductory public health school class. Methods. Sixty students were divided into 6 online blog groups. Students posted their assignments (case analyses, news commentaries), prompting comments from other students. Anonymous poll surveys of students were conducted at midpoint and at the end of the course. Results. Sixty percent reported that blog participation enriched their learning quite a bit, 34% a small amount, and 6% not at all; 54% said that the blogs provided opportunities to learn from classmates. When comparing writing on the blog to speaking in class, 60% found it easier, 30% about the same, and 10% harder. About 65% said that skills attained by participating in blogs were useful for current or future work. Major criticisms involved time issues. Conclusions. Small seminar blogs offer opportunities for increased student participation, interaction, and learning. To be most effective and appealing, assignments for postings need to allow sufficient time for commentary. This educational technology has potential to expand the classroom experience and is worthy of further development and testing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.2008.133694

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Health blogs are being used, in part, to forge support networks among bloggers and their readers.

    “That most of these blogs were written from a patient–consumer or caregiver perspective suggests that health blogs are being used, in part, to forge support networks among bloggers and their readers.14,25,42,58”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [4]Downes S. Educational blogging. Educause Rev. 2004;39:14–26. Available at: http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERM0450.pdf. Accessed February 26, 2008. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goldman, R. H., Cohen, A. P., & Sheahan, F.
Affiliations
Cambridge Health Alliance (US)
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2008-09
Volume
98
Issue
9
Pages
1658-1663
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W2020473932
Cited by
85
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 8
FWCI
30.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology in Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
Keywords
student participation, online learning, public health education, graduate education, student interaction, educational technology, student perceptions, time constraints
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Boston, Competency-Based Education, Cooperative Behavior, Data Collection, Education, Graduate, Group Processes, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Learning, Mental Processes, Professional Competence, Public Health, United States, Problem-Based Learning, Educational Technology, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review