The Influence of the VERB Campaign on Children's Physical Activity in 2002 to 2006
Open accessAbstract
Objectives. We evaluated physical activity outcomes for children exposed to VERB, a campaign to encourage physical activity in children, across campaign years 2002 to 2006. Methods. We examined the associations between exposure to VERB and (1) physical activity sessions (free time and organized) and (2) psychosocial outcomes (outcome expectations, self-efficacy, and social influences) for 3 nationally representative cohorts of children. Outcomes among adolescents aged 13 to 17 years (cohort 1, baseline) and children aged 9 to 13 years from cohorts 2 and 3 were analyzed for dose–response effects. Propensity scoring was used to control for confounding influences. Results. Awareness of VERB remained high across campaign years. In 2006, reports of children aged 10 to 13 years being active on the day before the survey increased significantly as exposure to the campaign increased. Psychosocial outcomes showed dose–response associations. Effects lessened as children aged out of the campaign target age range (cohort 1, baseline), but dose–response associations persisted in 2006 for outcome expectations and free-time physical activity. Conclusions. VERB positively influenced children's physical activity outcomes. Campaign effects persisted as children grew into their adolescent years.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In quasi-experimental pre/post evaluations, statewide and community-level mass media campaigns generally improved self-reported awareness of the campaign, attitudes toward activity, and in a few studies self-reported general activity levels.
“In quasi-experimental (pre/post) evaluations, such campaigns generally improved self-reported measures such as awareness of the campaign, changes in attitudes toward activity, and, in a few studies, self-reported general activity levels.72,73”
From Population Approaches to Improve Diet, Physical Activity, and Smoking Habits: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2012) · cites this paper as [73]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 111
- Authors
- Huhman, M. E., Potter, L. D., Nolin, M. J., Piesse, A., Judkins, D. R., Banspach, S. W., & Wong, F. L.
- Affiliations
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
- Venue
- American Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- American Public Health Association
- Published
- 2010-04
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 638-645
- ISSN
- 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0048
- PMC
- PMC2836341
- OpenAlex
- W2042262553
- Cited by
- 111
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 5.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
- Keywords
- children's physical activity, health campaigns, campaign exposure, leisure-time physical activity, organized physical activity, outcome expectations, self-efficacy, social influence, dose-response relationship, adolescents
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Attitude, Child, Health Promotion, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Parents, Physical Fitness, Psychology, Schools, Time Factors, United States, Program Evaluation, Exercise, Logistic Models, Outcome Assessment, Health Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review