Cited by 88Health disparities and outcomesHealthcare Systems and Public HealthGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening

Underlying Causes of the Emerging Nonmetropolitan Mortality Penalty

Open access
Cossman, Jeralynn S., James, Wesley L., Cosby, Arthur G., Cossman, Ronald E.·2010·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

The nonmetropolitan mortality penalty results in an estimated 40 201 excessive US deaths per year, deaths that would not occur if nonmetropolitan and metropolitan residents died at the same rate. We explored the underlying causes of the nonmetropolitan mortality penalty by examining variation in cause of death. Declines in heart disease and cancer death rates in metropolitan areas drive the nonmetropolitan mortality penalty. Future work should explore why the top causes of death are higher in nonmetropolitan areas than they are in metropolitan areas.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.2009.174185

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [6]International Classification of Diseases, Adapted for Use in the United States, Eighth Revision (ICDA) Washington, DC: World Health Organization; 1968 [Google Scholar]
  2. [7]International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1980 [Google Scholar]
  3. [8]International Classification of Diseases, or 10th Revision Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1992 [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cossman, J. S., James, W. L., Cosby, A. G., & Cossman, R. E.
Affiliations
Mississippi State University (US)
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2010-08
Volume
100
Issue
8
Pages
1417-1419
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W2022475114
Cited by
88
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Mississippi State University
  • National Center for Injury Prevention and Control
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Healthcare Systems and Public Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Keywords
cause-specific mortality, heart disease mortality, cancer mortality, metropolitan areas, rural health, excess mortality
MeSH terms
Cause of Death, Forecasting, Health Services Accessibility, Heart Diseases, Humans, Life Expectancy, National Center for Health Statistics, U.S., Neoplasms, Population Surveillance, Quality of Health Care, Rural Health, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Urban Health, Causality, Incidence, Cluster Analysis, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review