Association of Returning to Work With Better Health in Working-Aged Adults: A Systematic Review
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: We systematically reviewed the literature on the impact of returning to work on health among working-aged adults. METHODS: We searched 6 electronic databases in 2005. We selected longitudinal studies that documented a transition from unemployment to employment and included a comparison group. Two reviewers independently appraised the retrieved literature for potential relevance and methodological quality. RESULTS: Eighteen studies met our inclusion criteria, including 1 randomized controlled trial. Fifteen studies revealed a beneficial effect of returning to work on health, either demonstrating a significant improvement in health after reemployment or a significant decline in health attributed to continued unemployment. We also found evidence for health selection, suggesting that poor health interferes with people's ability to go back to work. Some evidence suggested that earlier reemployment may be associated with better health. CONCLUSIONS: Beneficial health effects of returning to work have been documented in a variety of populations, times, and settings. Return-to-work programs may improve not only financial situations but also health.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Employment may be associated with positive outcomes such as increased physical and mental health.
“Employment may be associated with positive outcomes such as increased physical and mental health [11–13].”
From Supported employment: Meta-analysis and review of randomized controlled trials of individual placement and support (2019) · cites this paper as [12]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 97 · Cited by 199
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- [48]Moeri R, Balague F, Carron R, van Melle G. Lombalgies chroniques et reinsertion professionnelle: facteurs pronostiques [Chronic back pain and professional rehabilitation: prognostic factors]. Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1991;121(50):1897–1899 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [66]Montgomery SM, Cook DG, Bartley MJ, Wadsworth MEJ. Unemployment, cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption and body weight in young British men. Eur J Public Health. 1998;8(1):21–27 [Google Scholar]
- [69]Pelicier Y. Psychopathologic problems related to unemployment. [Problèmes psychopathologiques liés au chômage.] Presse Therm Clim. 1984;121(4):193–195 [Google Scholar]
- [70]Philippe A. Suicide et chômage. [Suicide and unemployment.] Psychol Med (Paris). 1988;20(3):380–382 [Google Scholar]
- Authors
- Rueda, S., Chambers, L., Wilson, M., Mustard, C., Rourke, S. B., Bayoumi, A., Raboud, J., & Lavis, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Venue
- American Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- American Public Health Association
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 541-556
- ISSN
- 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0048
- PMC
- PMC3487667
- OpenAlex
- W1990257140
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 97
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 2.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Employment and Welfare Studies
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
- Social Sciences › Demography › Retirement, Disability, and Employment
- Keywords
- return to work, reemployment, unemployment, health outcomes, working-age adults, health selection, return-to-work programs, work and health
- MeSH terms
- Employment, Health Status, Humans, Middle Aged, Rehabilitation, Databases, Factual, Treatment Outcome, Sick Leave
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review