Engaging individuals recently released from prison into primary care: a randomized trial
Open accessAbstract
Objectives. Individuals released from prison have high rates of chronic conditions but minimal engagement in primary care. We compared 2 interventions designed to improve primary care engagement and reduce acute care utilization: Transitions Clinic, a primary care–based care management program with a community health worker, versus expedited primary care. Methods. We performed a randomized controlled trial from 2007 to 2009 among 200 recently released prisoners who had a chronic medical condition or were older than 50 years. We abstracted 12-month outcomes from an electronic repository available from the safety-net health care system. Main outcomes were (1) primary care utilization (2 or more visits to the assigned primary care clinic) and (2) emergency department (ED) utilization (the proportion of participants making any ED visit). Results. Both groups had similar rates of primary care utilization (37.7% vs 47.1%; P = .18). Transitions Clinic participants had lower rates of ED utilization (25.5% vs 39.2%; P = .04). Conclusions. Chronically ill patients leaving prison will engage in primary care if provided early access. The addition of a primary care–based care management program tailored for returning prisoners reduces ED utilization over expedited primary care.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A study examining a similar hospital-based violence intervention found the program had no impact for primary prevention of incarceration.
“A study examining a similar intervention found that the program had no impact for primary prevention of incarceration; the authors hypothesized this may be due to the low enrollment numbers when the study lost funding.46”
From Community investment interventions as a means for decarceration: A scoping review (2022) · cites this paper as [46]
The Results (Return to Jail; page unavailable) found no significant difference in return-to-jail rates between the two groups. But this was a primary care trial involving people already released from prison, not a hospital-based violence intervention testing primary prevention of incarceration. The Discussion reports high participation, and our copy does not support the explanation that low enrollment followed a loss of funding. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 27 · Cited by 1
This paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.
- Authors
- Wang, E. A., Hong, C. S., Shavit, S., Sanders, R., Kessell, E., & Kushel, M. B.
- Affiliations
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Venue
- American Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- American Public Health Association
- Published
- 2012-09
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- e22-e29
- ISSN
- 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0048
- PMC
- PMC3482056
- OpenAlex
- W7214220124
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5k23hl103720-02)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
- Keywords
- prisoner reentry, primary care engagement, care management, community health workers, emergency department utilization, acute care utilization, chronic disease, older adults, safety net health care
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Chronic Disease, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Primary Health Care, Prisoners, San Francisco, Community-Based Participatory Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review