Cited by 131Vaccine Coverage and HesitancyMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsCervical Cancer and HPV Research

Influenza Vaccine Text Message Reminders for Urban, Low-Income Pregnant Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Open access
Stockwell, Melissa S., Westhoff, Carolyn, Kharbanda, Elyse Olshen, Vargas, Celibell Y., Camargo, Stewin, Vawdrey, David K., Castaño, Paula M.·2014·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Objectives. We evaluated the impact of influenza vaccine text message reminders in a low-income obstetric population. Methods. We conducted a randomized controlled trial that enrolled 1187 obstetric patients from 5 community-based clinics in New York City. The intervention group received 5 weekly text messages regarding influenza vaccination starting mid-September 2011 and 2 text message appointment reminders. Both groups received standard automated telephone appointment reminders. The prespecified endpoints were receipt of either pre- or postpartum influenza vaccination calculated cumulatively at the end of each month (September–December 2011). Results. After adjusting for gestational age and number of clinic visits, women who received the intervention were 30% more likely to be vaccinated as of December 2011 (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.003, 1.69 end of September: AOR = 1.34; 95% CI = 0.98, 1.85; October: AOR = 1.35; 95% CI = 1.05, 1.75; November: AOR = 1.27; 95% CI = 0.98, 1.65). The subgroup of women early in the third trimester at randomization showed the greatest intervention effect (December 31: 61.9% intervention vs 49.0% control; AOR = 1.88; 95% CI = 1.12, 3.15). Conclusions. In this low-income obstetric population, text messaging was associated with increased influenza vaccination, especially in those who received messages early in their third trimester.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.2013.301620

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Since the 1990s, tension between trade and tobacco control has escalated as new legal rules concerning intellectual property and foreign investment have enabled investors, including tobacco companies, to challenge domestic public health policies in international trade and investment arbitration courts.

    “Since the 1990s, the tension between trade and tobacco control has escalated1 as new legal rules concerning intellectual property and foreign investment have enabled investors (including tobacco companies) to challenge domestic public health policies in international trade and investment arbitration courts.2–4”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stockwell, M. S., Westhoff, C., Kharbanda, E. O., Vargas, C. Y., Camargo, S., Vawdrey, D. K., & Castaño, P. M.
Affiliations
NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US)
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2014-02
Volume
104
Issue
S1
Pages
e7-e12
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W1999861857
Cited by
131
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 7
FWCI
14.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service (R40 MC 17169)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Keywords
influenza vaccination, SMS reminders, pregnant women, low-income populations, appointment reminders, third trimester, prenatal care, maternal immunization, urban clinics
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Gestational Age, Humans, Influenza Vaccines, New York City, Poverty, Pregnancy, Urban Population, Reminder Systems, Young Adult, Text Messaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review