Primary Prevention of Lead Poisoning: Protecting Children From Unsafe Housing
Open accessAbstract
Objectives. We examined the effects of changes in Rhode Island’s Lead Hazard Mitigation Law in 2005 on children’s blood lead levels. Methods. We used 2005 to 2009 data from Rhode Island’s Lead Elimination Surveillance System; city tax assessor records in Central Falls, Pawtucket, Providence, and Woonsocket, Rhode Island; and records of conformance to the state’s lead hazard mitigation law, to assess the extent to which legislation changes resulted in minimizing children’s exposure to lead. Results. During the 5-year study, the proportion of properties that complied with the new law increased for properties that housed young children. However, the majority of rental properties did not comply with the law. Children’s lead levels declined by approximately 1 microgram per deciliter on average in properties that did comply, demonstrating that the law could have a protective effect for children. Conclusions. Legislation changes increased the proportion of properties that were certified as nonhazardous, leading to decreased blood lead levels for children living in these properties. However, legislation cannot be a highly effective primary prevention strategy if it does not cover all properties where children live and is not strictly enforced.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Individual blood lead levels generally declined in a household after a lead-safe certificate was issued.
“Individual blood lead levels generally declined in a household after a certificate has been issued (Rogers et al. 2014).”
From Do Low Levels of Blood Lead Reduce Children's Future Test Scores? (2018) · cites this paper as Rogers et al. 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [5]5. 2012 Rhode Island Kids Count Factbook. 2012. Providence, RI: Rhode Island KIDS COUNT. Available at: http://www.rikidscount.org/matriarch/documents/2012_Factbook_FINAL.pdf. Accessed November 14, 2012. 6.Vivier PM, Hauptman M, Weitzen SH, Bell S, Quilliam DN, Logan JR. The important health impact of where a child lives: neighborhood characteristics and the burden of lead poisoning. Matern Child Health J. 2011;15(8):1195–1202. doi: 10.1007/s10995-010-0692-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [8]8. Housing Resources Commission. Rules and regulations: lead mitigation regulations. 2003. Available at: http://sos.ri.gov/documents/archives/regdocs/released/pdf/RIHRC/6481.pdf. Accessed July 24, 2013. 9.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Preventing lead exposure in young children: a housing-based approach to primary prevention of lead poisoning. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2004. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nceh/lead/publications/primarypreventiondocument.pdf. Accessed November 14, 2012. [Google Scholar] Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Do Low Levels of Blood Lead Reduce Children's Future Test Scores?
Aizer, A., Currie, J., Simon, P., & Vivier, P. (2018) · American Economic Journal: Applied Economics · doi:10.1257/app.20160404 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Rogers, M. L., Lucht, J. A., Sylvaria, A. J., Cigna, J., Vanderslice, R., & Vivier, P. M.
- Affiliations
- Rhode Island Department of Health (US)
- ORCID
- Rogers, Michelle L.
- Venue
- American Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- American Public Health Association
- Published
- 2014-08
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- e119-e124
- ISSN
- 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0048
- PMC
- PMC4103256
- OpenAlex
- W2127121959
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 0.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Brown University
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
- Keywords
- lead poisoning, primary prevention, children's blood lead levels, lead-based paint, housing safety, rental housing, enforcement of legislation, Rhode Island
- MeSH terms
- Child, Child, Preschool, Environmental Exposure, Housing, Humans, Lead, Lead Poisoning, Mass Screening, Primary Prevention, Residence Characteristics, Rhode Island
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review