Cited by 114Heavy Metal Exposure and ToxicitySchool Choice and PerformanceEnvironmental Justice and Health Disparities

Do Low Levels of Blood Lead Reduce Children's Future Test Scores?

Open access
Aizer, Anna, Currie, Janet, Simon, Peter, Vivier, Patrick·2018·American Economic Journal: Applied Economics

Abstract

We construct a unique individual-level dataset linking preschool blood lead levels with third grade test scores for Rhode Island children born 1997–2005. Using two identification strategies, we show for the first time that reductions of lead from even historically low levels have significant positive effects. A one-unit decrease in average blood lead levels reduces the probability of being substantially below proficient in reading (math) by 0.96 (0.79) percentage points on a baseline of 12 (16) percent. Since disadvantaged children have greater exposure to lead, lead poisoning may be one of the causes of continuing disparities in test scores. (JEL I12, I14, I18, I21, I24, J13)

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Using linked Rhode Island administrative data, the paper finds that reductions in preschool blood lead levels at historically low levels improve third-grade reading and math outcomes. Instrumental-variable estimates that address measurement error are substantially larger than OLS, though the certificate-based IV estimates are noisier.

Key findings

A one-unit decrease in average blood lead levels reduces the probability of being substantially below proficient in reading by 0.96 percentage points on a baseline of 12 percent, and in math by 0.79 percentage points on a baseline of 16 percent, using the first IV strategy.

  • The first IV raises the estimated effect of a unit of blood lead on reading from −0.188 to −0.436 and on math from −0.124 to −0.305; eliminating lead from 2.7 to zero micrograms per deciliter increased mean reading and math scores by 1.18 and 0.82 points, or 9 and 6 percent of a standard deviation, and reduced below-proficiency reading by 2.6 percentage points (22 percent) and math by 2.1 percentage points (13 percent).
  • The second IV, based on lead-safe certificates, yields reading estimates about three times the OLS estimates and about double the first IV estimates, but the estimates are imprecise; math estimates are imprecise, and confidence intervals encompass both the OLS and first-IV estimates.
  • Disadvantaged children had greater lead exposure, and the certificate program disproportionately affected poor and minority children; the paper suggests possible “double jeopardy” from greater exposure and greater impact of the same exposure.

Methods

The sample includes all Rhode Island children born January 1997–September 2005 with at least one blood lead measurement before age six and enrolled in a Rhode Island public school, yielding roughly 71,000 children with linked blood lead and third-grade NECAP test-score data; children have an average of 2.7 blood lead measures, and birth certificate data are available for 85 percent.

  • The paper estimates OLS models of third-grade reading and math scaled scores and “substantially below proficient” indicators on the geometric mean of preschool blood lead levels, with child, maternal, census tract, tract fixed effects, and school/grade controls.
  • Two IV strategies address measurement error and confounding: first, using multiple blood lead measures so one measure instruments another; second, using a predicted lead-safe certificate at birth, modeled from census tract certificate availability and family characteristics, as an instrument for blood lead levels.

Limitations

Paper-stated limitations include confounding because children with higher lead levels are more disadvantaged, measurement error in blood lead levels, imprecise second-IV estimates whose confidence intervals encompass OLS and first-IV estimates, non-robust certificate-based IV results for math, and about 15 percent of the sample missing birth information.

  • Evident from the text: the sample is Rhode Island public-school children, so national generalizability is limited; the certificate-based IV estimates apply to children most likely affected by the targeted lead-safe certificate program; and the findings concern historically low blood lead levels, not the higher levels common in much prior literature.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1257/app.20160404

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

4 of 13 cited sources checked · 1 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Prior studies document a significant correlation between childhood lead levels less than 10 ug/ml and cognitive and behavioral outcomes including ADHD and hyperactivity.

    “Chandramouli, Ellis, and Emond (2009); Canfield et al. (2003); Lanphear et al. (2005); Nigg et al. (2010); and Wasserman et al. (1997) all document a significant correlation between lead levels less than 10 milograms per deciliter (ug/ml) during childhood and cognitive and behavioral outcomes including ADHD and hyperactivity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Chandramouli, Ellis, and Emond (2009) source
    • cites Canfield et al. (2003) source

      The Abstract reports a significant inverse association between blood lead concentration and IQ, including among children whose concentrations remained below 10 µg per deciliter. It does not report associations with ADHD or hyperactivity. The cited threshold is in µg per deciliter, not µg per milliliter as printed in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.89)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Lanphear et al. (2005) source

      The Abstract and Discussion (page numbers unavailable) report a significant association between blood lead below 10 μg/dL and lower childhood IQ. The paper does not report ADHD or hyperactivity outcomes at those levels; its discussion of behavioral problems refers to lead levels above 10 μg/dL. The citing sentence also gives the concentration unit incorrectly: the paper uses μg/dL. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    A meta-analysis of eight epidemiological studies reported that adding more family controls to a relatively parsimonious set did little to alter the relationship between lead and IQ in children.

    “This finding is consistent with a meta-analysis of eight studies conducted by epidemiologists in which they reported that adding more family controls to a relatively parsimonious set (maternal schooling and IQ, the HOME score, birth weight, and city) did little to alter the relationship between lead and IQ in children (Rothenberg and Rothenberg 2005).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rothenberg and Rothenberg 2005 source

      The Materials and Methods (Data sets; page unavailable) says that additional control variables did not significantly alter the child IQ–lead relationship. It also says that seven of eight eligible studies contributed to the pooled analysis, not that a meta-analysis included eight studies. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingown data

    A one-unit decrease in average blood lead levels reduces the probability of being substantially below proficient in reading by 0.96 percentage points on a baseline of 12 percent.

    “A one-unit decrease in average blood lead levels reduces the probability of being substantially below proficient in reading (math) by 0.96 (0.79) percentage points on a baseline of 12 (16) percent.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Measurement errors in repeated blood lead measures are uncorrelated.
  • Findingown data

    A one-unit decrease in average blood lead levels reduces the probability of being substantially below proficient in math by 0.79 percentage points on a baseline of 16 percent.

    “A one-unit decrease in average blood lead levels reduces the probability of being substantially below proficient in reading (math) by 0.96 (0.79) percentage points on a baseline of 12 (16) percent.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Measurement errors in repeated blood lead measures are uncorrelated.
  • Findingown data

    Seventeen percent of the children live in a home that received a lead-safe certificate at some point during the sample.

    “Seventeen percent of the children live in a home that received a lead-safe certificate at some point during our sample.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 21
  • May combine two claims. 47
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Individual blood lead levels generally declined in a household after a lead-safe certificate was issued.

    “Individual blood lead levels generally declined in a household after a certificate has been issued (Rogers et al. 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rogers et al. 2014 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    African American and Hispanic children and children who always receive free school lunch have higher mean blood lead levels (4.2, 3.6, and 3.9, respectively).

    “African American and Hispanic children both have higher mean levels, as do children who always receive free school lunch (4.2, 3.6, and 3.9, respectively).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Estimates using the subsample with multiple children and including address fixed effects are remarkably similar to those presented above, although the IV specification based on predicted certificates is somewhat larger than before.

    “Again, the results are remarkably similar to those presented above, although now the IV specification based on predicted certificates is somewhat larger than before.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Eighty percent of all children with a Rhode Island birth certificate are screened at least once, and the screening rate remained constant throughout the study period.

    “Compared with a national lead screening rate of only 25 percent, 80 percent of all children with a Rhode Island birth certificate are screened at least once, and the screening rate remained constant throughout the study period, suggesting that the demographics of children screened also likely remained constant.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Table 2 showed that African Americans and children eligible for free lunch experienced greater average reductions in blood lead levels over the period examined.

    “Table 2 showed that African Americans and children eligible for free lunch experienced greater average reductions in blood lead levels over the period we examine.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Minority children are more likely to have mean blood lead levels above 5: 30 percent of African American, 23 percent of Hispanic, and 27 percent of always free lunch children, compared to 14 percent of white children.

    “Minority children are also more likely to have high mean scores, with 30 percent of African American, 23 percent of Hispanic, and 27 percent of always free lunch children having levels above 5 (compared to 14 percent of white children).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Measurement error is a considerable problem and tends to lead to significant attenuation in the estimated effect of lead exposure on test scores.

    “The results of these estimations suggest that measurement error is a considerable problem and that it tends to lead to significant attenuation in the estimated effect of lead exposure on test scores.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For reading, the IV estimates are statistically significant and roughly three times as large as the OLS estimates in the first column.

    “The second column of Table 8 shows that for reading, the IV estimates are statistically significant and roughly three times as large as the OLS estimates in the first column.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    The OLS estimate based on imputed values is quite similar to the estimate shown in Table 3A.

    “Given this high degree of correlation in the measures, it is not surprising that the OLS estimate based on these imputed values shown in panel A is quite similar to the estimate shown in Table 3A.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Children with at least one lead screen are slightly more disadvantaged along most maternal characteristics than those without a lead screen, except birth weight, which is the same for the two groups.

    “Using vital statistics data to compare the maternal characteristics (race, education, and marital status) of children with a blood lead level (80 percent) to those without a blood lead level (20 percent), we find that those with at least one lead screen are slightly more disadvantaged along most measures, with the exception of birth weight, which is the same for the two groups.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Adding census tract fixed effects has little impact on the estimated effects of lead once individual-level variables are included, suggesting little residual confounding due to omitted variables bias.

    “effects of lead once individual-level variables are included in the model suggesting that there may actually be little residual confounding due to omitted variables bias in this instance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Twelve percent of children were substantially below proficient in reading and 16 percent in mathematics.

    “Twelve percent of children were “substantially below proficient” (defined as a score less than 30) in reading, and 16 percent in mathematics.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Hausman tests suggest that estimates based on the first instrument differ significantly from OLS, but IV estimates based on the certificate program instrument do not differ significantly from OLS.

    “Hausman tests of the equality of the OLS and the two IV estimates suggest that while estimates based on the first instrument (alternative measures for the same child) differ significantly from the OLS estimates, the confidence intervals are wide enough that the IV estimates based on the certificate program instrument do not differ significantly from the OLS estimates (Appendix Table 4).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For the lifetime imputed measure, the OLS estimate is again quite similar to that discussed above, while the IV based on the predicted certificate is much larger than any previous estimates.

    “The OLS estimate is again quite similar to that discussed above, while the IV based on the predicted certificate is much larger than any of the previous estimates.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    OLS point estimates in the smaller sample of children with at least two tests are smaller than full-sample geometric mean estimates, consistent with an average being less noisy than a single measure.

    “The point estimates in this sample are smaller than those shown in the full sample and based on the geometric mean (Tables 3A and 3B), consistent with an average being less noisy than a single measure.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The overall estimated effect of a predicted certificate on blood lead levels is strongly negative, and is much more strongly negative for groups with high initial blood lead levels, consistent with these groups being most impacted by new lead mitigation policies enacted in 1997.

    “The overall estimated effect of a predicted certificate on blood lead levels is strongly negative, and is much more strongly negative for the groups with high initial BLLs consistent with these groups being the most impacted by the new lead mitigation policies enacted in 1997.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Interactions in column 2 suggest that the total number of certificates in the tract was more highly predictive of having a certificate in the child's home if the child was African American or Hispanic, or always eligible for free lunch.

    “The interactions in column 2 further suggest that the total number of certificates in the tract was more highly predictive of having a certificate in the child’s home if the child was African American or Hispanic, or always eligible for free lunch.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Whether the home ever received a certificate over the sample period is highly predictive, as are some census tract-level variables such as median family income and the share of newer housing, both negatively associated with having a certificate in the home.

    “Of course, whether the home ever received a certificate over the course of our sample period is also highly predictive as are some of the census tract-level variables such as median family income and the share of newer housing, both of which are negatively associated with having a certificate in the home.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingreasoning

    The neighborhoods with the biggest gains in certificates and reductions in child lead levels were predominantly African American and poor and remained so after the lead clean-up.

    “These neighborhoods were also predominantly African American and poor and remained so after the lead clean-up.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The estimated increase in the probability of being less than proficient rises from 0.47 to 0.96 percentage points in reading, and from 0.38 to 0.79 in math.

    “The estimated increase in the probability of being less than proficient rises from 0.47 percentage points to 0.96 percentage points in reading. The corresponding increase for math is from 0.38 to 0.79.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The gains in test scores were greatest in the groups most affected by the certificate program and showing the greatest declines in blood lead levels.

    “However, the gains were greatest in the groups that were most affected by the certificate program and showed the greatest declines in BLLs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Overall, 40 percent of children have at least one blood lead measure above 5 and 9 percent have a measure above 10 micrograms per deciliter.

    “Note that it is not at all unusual in Rhode Island for a child to have a single BLL above 5 or even above 10 micrograms per deciliter—overall, 40 percent of children have at least one measure above 5 and 9 percent have a measure above 10.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Both instrumental variables strategies yield estimates that are considerably larger than OLS, suggesting that measurement error is a real concern.

    “Both IV strategies yield estimates that are considerably larger than OLS, suggesting that measurement error is a real concern.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Measurement errors in repeated blood lead measures are uncorrelated.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For mathematics, the estimates are imprecise, and for both math and reading the confidence intervals encompass both the OLS estimates and the corresponding IV estimates from Table 5.

    “For mathematics, the estimates are unfortunately imprecise, and for both math and reading the confidence intervals encompass both the OLS estimates and the corresponding IV estimates from Table 5.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Among children who were always eligible for the free lunch program, reading test scores rose by 11.2 percent and the percent substantially below proficient in reading fell from 27 to 18 percent.

    “Among children who were always eligible for the free lunch program, reading test scores rose by 11.2 percent, and the percent who were substantially below proficient in reading fell from 27 to 18 percent, a remarkable improvement.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Neighborhoods with a greater share of old housing and higher initial child lead levels in 1997 witnessed the biggest gains in lead-safe certificates issued and the biggest reductions in child lead levels.

    “Neighborhoods with a greater share of old housing (one of the primary sources of lead paint in Rhode Island), and with higher initial child lead levels (as measured in 1997), witnessed the biggest gains in the number of lead-safe certificates issued, and the biggest reductions in child lead levels.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Excluding observations missing birth information, OLS and first IV estimates are quite similar to those reported above; the predicted certificate IV specification is still larger than the first IV specification but is no longer statistically significant.

    “Column 1 of Table 9 shows OLS and the two sets of IV estimates from a sample that excludes these observations. The OLS and first set of IV estimates are quite similar to those reported above. The predicted certificate IV specification is still larger that the first IV specification, but is no longer statistically significant.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Among children who never participated in the free lunch program, reading test scores rose by 5.9 percent and the percent not proficient in reading fell from 6 to 4 percent.

    “For instance, among children who never participated in the free lunch program, reading test scores rose by 5.9 percent and the percent who were not proficient in reading fell from 6 to 4 percent.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Academic test scores average 45.5 for reading and 42.2 for math, with standard deviations of 13.

    “Academic test scores range from 0 to 80, with an average score of 45.5 for reading (standard deviation of 13) and 42.2 for math (standard deviation of 13).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The mean blood lead level is 3.1, well below the CDC threshold for medical intervention of 5 micrograms per deciliter.

    “The mean BLL is 3.1, which is well below the CDCs threshold for medical intervention of 5 micrograms per deciliter.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Using the first instrument increases the estimated impact of a unit of blood lead on reading from -0.188 to -0.436 and on math from -0.124 to -0.305.

    “Using this instrument increases the estimated impact of a unit of blood lead on reading (math) from −0.188 (−0.124) to −0.436 (−0.305).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In census-tract aggregated estimation for reading, the estimated effects are similar but slightly larger than those in Table 8; a one unit increase in blood lead levels is estimated to reduce reading scores by -1.251.

    “The estimated effects are similar but slightly larger than those described in Table 8. A one unit increase in BLLs is estimated to reduce reading scores by −1.251.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    About 15 percent of the sample are missing birth information, primarily because they were born outside Rhode Island.

    “About 15 percent of our sample are missing birth information, primarily because they were born outside of Rhode Island.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Estimates from the second instrumental variables strategy are considerably larger but also noisier, so the paper cannot reject the null that confidence intervals encompass both the OLS and first set of instrumental variables estimates.

    “The estimates from the second IV strategy are considerably larger but also noisier so that we cannot reject the null that confidence intervals encompass both the OLS and first set of IV estimates.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Measurement errors in repeated blood lead measures are uncorrelated.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Third grade test scores rose across birth cohorts in all demographic groups, while the fraction scoring substantially below proficient declined.

    “Third grade test scores rose across birth cohorts in all demographic groups, while the fraction scoring substantially below proficient declined.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Column 3 estimates suggest that a 1 point increase in mean blood lead levels reduces reading scores by -0.335 and math scores by -0.220.

    “The column 3 estimates suggest that a 1 point increase in mean BLLs is estimated to reduce reading scores by −0.335, and math scores by −0.220.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The reading IV estimates are about double the size of the corresponding IV estimates in Table 5.

    “They are also about double the size of the corresponding IV estimates in Table 5.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    IV estimates in Table 5, column 2 are much larger than OLS estimates: for reading the coefficient rises from -0.186 to -0.442, and for math from -0.124 to -0.305.

    “The IV estimates shown in Table 5, column 2 are much larger than the OLS estimates. For reading the estimated coefficient rises from −0.186 to −0.442; for math the value rises from −0.124 to −0.305.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Adding birth certificate information and time-varying census tract characteristics reduces the estimated effects of lead from -0.456 to -0.326 for reading and from -0.348 to -0.216 for math, suggesting confounding could be a concern in studies with inadequate controls for family background.

    “These additions reduce the estimated effects of lead from −0.456 per unit of lead to −0.326 for reading and from −0.348 to −0.216 for math, suggesting that confounding could be a concern in studies with inadequate controls for family background.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The estimate using the predicted certificate instrument is also quite similar to that shown in Table 5.

    “Since now we have only one imputed measure, this method does not lend itself to our first IV strategy, but the estimate using the predicted certificate instrument is also quite similar to that shown in Table 5.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The effects for math in the census-tract aggregated estimation are small and imprecisely estimated.

    “However, the effects for math (not shown) are small and imprecisely estimated.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The estimated effects of lead in these models are strongly statistically significant but relatively small.

    “The estimated effects of lead in these models are strongly statistically significant but relatively small.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Estimates based on the average of all other tests are somewhat larger in absolute value than those based on a single randomly drawn test, consistent with averaging reducing random measurement errors.

    “The latter are somewhat larger in absolute value than those in column 3 consistent with averaging reducing the effects of random measurement errors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Focusing on the subsample with multiple children observed over time reduces the sample size to 26,131 children.

    “Focusing on this subsample reduces the sample size to 26,131 children.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Lead poisoning may be one of the causes of continuing disparities in test scores because disadvantaged children have greater exposure to lead.

    “Since disadvantaged children have greater exposure to lead, lead poisoning may be one of the causes of continuing disparities in test scores.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    African American and poor children are two to three times as likely to have elevated lead levels, defined as above 5 ug/dl.

    “For both these reasons, disparities in child BLLs by race and income remain, with African American and poor children two to three times as likely to have elevated lead levels, defined as above 5 ug/dl (CDC 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites CDC 2013

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The same reduction in lead reduced the probability of being below proficiency in reading by 2.6 percentage points, or 22 percent, and in math by 2.1 percentage points, or 13 percent.

    “The same reduction in lead reduced the probability of being below proficiency in reading by 2.6 percentage points, or 22 percent. For math the comparable figure is 2.1 percentage points or 13 percent.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    The observed gains in test scores might have been caused by other changes targeted at poor and minority children, most likely targeted educational policies.

    “Of course these gains might have been caused by other changes targeted at poor and minority children; the most likely alternative candidate is targeted educational policies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Although the second IV estimates are imprecise, they are substantially larger than those generated by the first IV method, perhaps providing preliminary evidence for heterogeneity in the impact of lead.

    “Although these estimates are imprecise, they are substantially larger than those generated by our first IV method, which perhaps provides some preliminary evidence for heterogeneity in the impact of lead.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given

    In 1997 Rhode Island established two programs to encourage mitigation of lead hazards in old homes.

    “In an effort to reduce childhood exposure to lead, in 1997 Rhode Island established two programs to encourage mitigation of lead hazards in old homes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    There may be considerable measurement error in blood lead levels, which complicates estimation.

    “As discussed above, estimation is complicated by the fact that there may be considerable measurement error in blood lead levels.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Ashenfelter and Krueger (1994)
    • cites Chalfin and McCrary (forthcoming)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The first instrumental variables strategy instruments one blood lead measure with another, assuming each is a noisy measure of true lead exposure and that measurement errors are uncorrelated, to purge measurement error.

    “If we regard each as a noisy measure of the child’s true lead exposure and assume that the measurement errors are uncorrelated, then we can instrument one measure with another in order to develop an estimate that is purged of measurement error.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Measurement errors in repeated blood lead measures are uncorrelated.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Using the predicted certificate purges the instrument of potential endogeneity associated with the take-up decision.

    “By using the “predicted certificate,” we purge the instrument of any potential endogeneity associated with the take-up decision.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The finding of larger effect sizes for reading relative to math is consistent with some epidemiological studies documenting stronger relationships between lead and verbal functioning.

    “The finding of larger effect sizes for reading relative to math is consistent with some epidemiological studies that have also documented stronger relationships between lead and verbal functioning (e.g., see Bellinger, Stiles, and Needleman 1992 as an example and CDC 2004 for a review of estimated effects of lead on verbal IQ and performance IQ).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bellinger, Stiles, and Needleman 1992 source
    • cites CDC 2004

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Disadvantaged children may suffer double jeopardy in the sense that they are both exposed to greater levels of lead and experience greater impacts of the same exposure.

    “Disadvantaged children may suffer double jeopardy in the sense that they are both exposed to greater levels of lead and experience greater impacts of the same exposure.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The predicted certificate instrument is not a function of unobservable child or family characteristics that influence certificate take-up and might also be correlated with test scores.

    “Importantly, the instrument, predicted certificate, is not a function of μi, the unobservable characteristics of the child or family that influence certificate take-up and that might also be correlated with test scores.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    These estimates seem generally consistent with estimates in the epidemiological literature, though direct comparisons are difficult because of differences in methods, adjustments for measurement error, and the higher lead levels examined in previous work.

    “These estimates seem generally consistent with estimates in the epidemiological literature, though direct comparisons are difficult because of differences in methods, adjustments for measurement error, and the higher lead levels examined in previous work.23”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [23]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    For the average public school child, eliminating lead by reducing lead levels from 2.7 to zero micrograms per deciliter increased mean reading and math scores by 1.18 and 0.82 points, respectively, corresponding to 9 and 6 percent of a standard deviation.

    “These figures suggest that for the average public school child, eliminating lead (by reducing lead levels from 2.7 to zero micrograms per deciliter) increased mean reading and math scores by 1.18 and 0.82 points, respectively, corresponding to 9 and 6 percent of a standard deviation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Black children in homes that had not yet received a certificate had blood lead levels two micrograms per deciliter higher than other black children, and this gap was reduced to zero when a certificate was obtained.

    “This comparison suggests that black children in homes that had not yet received a certificate had BLLs two micrograms per deciliter higher than other black children and that this gap was reduced to zero when a certificate was obtained.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
59 of 59
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Measurement errors in repeated blood lead measures are uncorrelated.

    “If we regard each as a noisy measure of the child’s true lead exposure and assume that the measurement errors are uncorrelated, then we can instrument one measure with another in order to develop an estimate that is purged of measurement error.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Issuance of a lead-safe certificate indicates that any lead hazard in the home had been mitigated, so it should be associated with lower blood lead levels.

    “Issuance of a certificate indicates that any lead hazard in the home had been mitigated, so it should be associated with lower BLLs.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Venous blood lead tests are far more accurate than capillary (finger prick) tests.

    “Venous tests are known to be far more accurate than capillary (finger prick) tests.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Measurement errors in subsequent blood lead tests for the same child are largely uncorrelated.

    “we believe it likely that measurement errors in subsequent tests for the same child will be largely uncorrelated.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Measurement errors in the two blood lead tests are independent.

    “assuming that the measurement errors in the two tests are independent”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Each blood lead measure can be interpreted as an imperfect measure of the underlying level of lead exposure during early childhood.

    “each measure can still be interpreted as an (imperfect) measure of the underlying level of lead exposure during early childhood.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The same dose of lead could have larger effects on poor and minority children if their families and schools are less likely to remediate the effects of lead.

    “The same “dose” of lead could have larger effects on these poor and minority children if their families and schools are less likely to be able to remediate the effects of lead.”
7 of 7

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Five-unit blood lead threshold switches from micrograms to milligrams

    Minor

    The paper describes the blood lead threshold as 5 micrograms per deciliter, but later describes the distribution above 5 milligrams per deciliter. Those are different concentrations.

  • Ten-unit blood lead threshold uses conflicting units

    Minor

    The cited threshold is written as "10 milograms per deciliter (ug/ml)," while the paper elsewhere uses 10 micrograms per deciliter. The units in the first statement also disagree with each other.

  • Math effect is stated in the opposite direction

    Minor

    The paper says an increase in blood lead reduces the probability of being substantially below proficient in math. Elsewhere, it says a decrease in blood lead reduces that probability; the two statements give opposite directions for the same 0.79-percentage-point effect.

3 of 3

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Ashenfelter Orley, 1994, American Economic Review, 84, 1157

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aizer, A., Currie, J., Simon, P., & Vivier, P.
Affiliations
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
  • Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Vivier, Patrick
Venue
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics
Published
2018-01-01
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
307-341
ISSN
  • 1945-7782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7790
OpenAlex
W2517590774
Cited by
114
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3
FWCI
5.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Economic Journal Applied Economics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P2CHD041020, P2CHD047879)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
Keywords
blood lead levels, lead exposure, lead poisoning, academic performance, test scores, third grade, reading proficiency, mathematics proficiency, educational inequality, disadvantaged children, preschool children, Rhode Island

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-29.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-29.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review