A Framework for Evaluating the Impact of Obesity Prevention Strategies on Socioeconomic Inequalities in Weight
Open accessAbstract
We developed a theoretical framework to organize obesity prevention interventions by their likely impact on the socioeconomic gradient of weight. The degree to which an intervention involves individual agency versus structural change influences socioeconomic inequalities in weight. Agentic interventions, such as standalone social marketing, increase socioeconomic inequalities. Structural interventions, such as food procurement policies and restrictions on unhealthy foods in schools, show equal or greater benefit for lower socioeconomic groups. Many obesity prevention interventions belong to the agento–structural types of interventions, and account for the environment in which health behaviors occur, but they require a level of individual agency for behavioral change, including workplace design to encourage exercise and fiscal regulation of unhealthy foods or beverages. Obesity prevention interventions differ in their effectiveness across socioeconomic groups. Limiting further increases in socioeconomic inequalities in obesity requires implementation of structural interventions. Further empirical evaluation, especially of agento–structural type interventions, remains crucial.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Marked inequalities exist in the treatment of obesity.
“Marked inequalities exist in the treatment of obesity, 103,104 and the disconnect between accessibility to these new treatments and need risks exacerbating this problem.”
From The societal implications of using glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for the treatment of obesity (2025) · cites this paper as [103]
Cites
Guh, D. P., Zhang, W., Bansback, N., Amarsi, Z., Birmingham, C. L., & Anis, A. H. (2009) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-9-88 · Cited by 3,855 · see citing works
Larson, N. I., Story, M. T., & Nelson, M. C. (2009) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2008.09.025 · Cited by 2,003 · see citing works
Booth, M. L., Bauman, A., Owen, N., & Gore, C. J. (1997) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1006/pmed.1996.9982 · Cited by 588 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Scragg, J., Koutoukidis, D. A., Dirksen, C., Heitmann, B. L., & Jebb, S. A. (2025) · Med · doi:10.1016/j.medj.2025.100805 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Richards, R., Wren, G., & Whitman, M. (2024) · JMIR Diabetes · doi:10.2196/52987 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Backholer, K., Beauchamp, A., Ball, K., Turrell, G., Martin, J., Woods, J., & Peeters, A.
- Affiliations
- Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute (AU)
- ORCID
- Venue
- American Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- American Public Health Association
- Published
- 2014-10
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- e43-e50
- ISSN
- 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0048
- PMC
- PMC4167106
- OpenAlex
- W1855917911
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 11.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Deakin Research Online (Deakin University) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
- Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
- Keywords
- obesity prevention, structural interventions, individual agency, social marketing, workplace design
- MeSH terms
- Body Weights and Measures, Environment, Health Policy, Health Promotion, Humans, Obesity, Socioeconomic Factors, Health Behavior, Health Status Disparities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review