The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Intended and Unintended Consequences of a Legal Measure to Cut the Flow of Illegal Cigarettes Into New York City: The Case of the South Bronx
Abstract
Objectives. We examined the impact of a change in New York tax law on the numbers of untaxed cigarettes bootlegged from Native American reservations and resold in the South Bronx. Methods. Discarded cigarette packs were systematically collected in 30 randomized South Bronx census tracks before and after the amended tax law went into effect in 2011. Also, administrative data were gathered on the number of taxed cigarettes sold in New York State, including sales to Native American reservations. Results. Before the tax amendment, 42% of discarded cigarette packs collected in the South Bronx had no tax stamp. After the tax law went into effect, the percentage of cigarette packs without tax stamps declined to 6.2%. Simultaneously, the percentage of packs with out-of-state tax stamps rose from 18.3% to 66.3%. The percentage of packs with a combined New York State and New York City tax stamp did not change after the tax amendment. Conclusions. After the tax amendment, the supply of contraband cigarettes appears to have quickly shifted from one lower-priced jurisdiction to another without a change in the overall prevalence of contraband cigarettes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In 2010, as a means to address the loss of ∼$500 000 in state income a day to sales on tribal lands,26 New York adjusted its implementation, and began requiring that all cigarettes receive tax stamps prior to shipment to tribal distributors, reducing the opportunity for tribal distributors to opt out of state tax collection.12 33 34”
From Common state mechanisms regulating tribal tobacco taxation and sales, the USA, 2015 (2016) · cites this paper as [33]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Merriman D, 2010, Am Econ J, 2, 61
- 10.17310/ntj.2013.3.05 · DOI
- 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051244 · DOI
- 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050412 · DOI
- 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050205 · DOI · Paper page
- Garrison LR, 2005, J State Taxation, 23, 11
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Common state mechanisms regulating tribal tobacco taxation and sales, the USA, 2015
DeLong, H., Chriqui, J., Leider, J., & Chaloupka, F. J. (2016) · Tobacco Control · doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053079 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Kurti, M., von Lampe, K., & Johnson, J.
- Affiliations
- Marin Kurti is with the School of Criminal Justice, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ. Klaus von Lampe is with the Department of Law, Police Science and Criminal Justice Administration, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, New York, NY. Jacqueline Johnson is with the Department of Anthropology and Sociology, Adelphi University, Garden City, NY.
- Venue
- American Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- American Public Health Association
- Published
- 2015-04
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 750-756
- ISSN
- 0090-0036
- 1541-0048
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Intended and Unintended Consequences of a Legal Measure to Cut the Flow of Illegal Cigarettes Into New York City: The Case of the South Bronx. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2105/ajph.2014.302340
- The paper
- Kurti, M., von Lampe, K., & Johnson, J. (2015). The Intended and Unintended Consequences of a Legal Measure to Cut the Flow of Illegal Cigarettes Into New York City: The Case of the South Bronx. American Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2014.302340