Cited by 8Healthcare Policy and ManagementHealthcare Systems and ReformsInsurance and Financial Risk Management

Gain in Insurance Coverage and Residual Uninsurance Under the Affordable Care Act: Texas, 2013–2016

Open access
Pickett, Stephen, Marks, Elena, Ho, Vivian·2017·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Objectives. To examine the effects of the Affordable Care Act’s (ACA’s) Marketplace on Texas residents and determine which population subgroups benefited the most and which the least. Methods. We analyzed insurance coverage rates among nonelderly Texas adults using the Health Reform Monitoring Survey-Texas from September 2013, just before the first open enrollment period in the Marketplace, through March 2016. Results. Texas has experienced a roughly 6–percentage-point increase in insurance coverage (from 74.7% to 80.6%; P = .012) after implementation of the major insurance provisions of the ACA. The 4 subgroups with the largest increases in adjusted insurance coverage between 2013 and 2016 were persons aged 50 to 64 years (12.1 percentage points; P = .002), Hispanics (10.9 percentage points; P = .002), persons reporting fair or poor health status (10.2 percentage points; P = .038), and those with a high school diploma as their highest educational attainment (9.2 percentage points; P = .023). Conclusions. Many population subgroups have benefited from the ACA’s Marketplace, but approximately 3 million Texas residents still lack health coverage. Adopting the ACA’s Medicaid expansion is a means to address the lack of coverage.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.2016.303510

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pickett, S., Marks, E., & Ho, V.
Affiliations
Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2017-01
Volume
107
Issue
1
Pages
120-126
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W2553266085
Cited by
8
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Rice University
  • Episcopal Health Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Healthcare Systems and Reforms
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Insurance and Financial Risk Management
Keywords
Affordable Care Act, health insurance coverage, Affordable Care Act Marketplace, Texas, uninsured population, Medicaid expansion, health care reform, Hispanic adults, health status, educational attainment, middle-aged adults, subgroup disparities
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Medicaid, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Texas, United States, Medically Uninsured, Insurance Coverage, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review