Recreational Cannabis Legalization and Opioid-Related Deaths in Colorado, 2000–2015
Open accessAbstract
Objectives. To examine the association between Colorado’s legalization of recreational cannabis use and opioid-related deaths. Methods. We used an interrupted time-series design (2000–2015) to compare changes in level and slope of monthly opioid-related deaths before and after Colorado stores began selling recreational cannabis. We also describe the percent change in opioid-related deaths by comparing the unadjusted model-smoothed number of deaths at the end of follow-up with the number of deaths just prior to legalization. Results. Colorado’s legalization of recreational cannabis sales and use resulted in a 0.7 deaths per month (b = −0.68; 95% confidence interval = −1.34, −0.03) reduction in opioid-related deaths. This reduction represents a reversal of the upward trend in opioid-related deaths in Colorado. Conclusions. Legalization of cannabis in Colorado was associated with short-term reductions in opioid-related deaths. As additional data become available, research should replicate these analyses in other states with legal recreational cannabis.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
60% of studies found potential for RCL to have protective effects for opioid-related negative consequences.
“Furthermore, while some findings were mixed and the number of studies limited, 60% of studies found potential for RCL to have protective effects for opioid-related negative consequences.87,88”
From The Impact of Recreational Cannabis Legalization on Cannabis Use and Associated Outcomes: A Systematic Review (2023) · cites this paper as [87]
Cites
Segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series studies in medication use research
Wagner, A. K., Soumerai, S. B., Zhang, F., & Ross-Degnan, D. (2002) · Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2710.2002.00430.x · Cited by 3,279 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Endocannabinoid System: A Potential Target for the Treatment of Various Diseases
Lowe, H., Toyang, N., Steele, B., Bryant, J., & Ngwa, W. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22179472 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
Farrelly, K. N., Wardell, J. D., Marsden, E., Scarfe, M. L., Najdzionek, P., Turna, J., & MacKillop, J. (2023) · Substance Abuse Research and Treatment · doi:10.1177/11782218231172054 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
- Authors
- Livingston, M. D., Barnett, T. E., Delcher, C., & Wagenaar, A. C.
- Affiliations
- University of North Texas Health Science Center (US)
- Venue
- American Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- American Public Health Association
- Published
- 2017-11
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1827-1829
- ISSN
- 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0048
- PMC
- PMC5637677
- OpenAlex
- W2764022619
- Cited by
- 136
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 23
- FWCI
- 16.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
- Keywords
- recreational cannabis legalization, opioid-related deaths, Colorado, cannabis policy, opioid epidemic, drug policy, cannabis sales
- MeSH terms
- Colorado, Humans, Marijuana Smoking, Opioid-Related Disorders, Drug Overdose
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review