The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Growth and Persistence of Place-Based Mortality in the United States: The Rural Mortality Penalty
Open accessAbstract
Objectives. To examine 47 years of US urban and rural mortality trends at the county level, controlling for effects of education, income, poverty, and race. Methods. We obtained (1) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention WONDER (Wide-ranging ONline Data for Epidemiologic Research) data (1970–2016) on 104 million deaths; (2) US Census data on education, poverty, and race; and (3) Bureau of Economic Analysis data on income. We calculated ordinary least square regression models, including interaction models, for each year. We graphed standardized parameter estimates for 47 years. Results. Rural–urban mortality disparities increased from the mid-1980s through 2016. We found education, race, and rurality to be strong predictors; we found strong interactions between percentage poverty and percentage rural, indicating that the largest penalty was in high-poverty, rural counties. Conclusions. The rural–urban mortality disparity was persistent, growing, and large when compared to other place-based disparities. The penalty had evolved into a high-poverty, rural penalty that rivaled the effects of education and exceeded the effects of race by 2016. Public Health Implications. Targeting public health programs that focus on high-poverty, rural locales is a promising strategy for addressing disparities in mortality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Association Between Income and Life Expectancy in the United States, 2001–2014
Chetty, R., Stepner, M., Abraham, S., Lin, S., Scuderi, B., Turner, N., Bergeron, A., & Cutler, D. (2016) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2016.4226 · Cited by 2,812
Underlying Causes of the Emerging Nonmetropolitan Mortality Penalty
Cossman, J. S., James, W. L., Cosby, A. G., & Cossman, R. E. (2010) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2009.174185 · Cited by 88
Self-citation
Cited by
Mouratidis, K. (2021) · Cities · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2021.103229 · Cited by 873
Rural-Urban Differences In Severe Maternal Morbidity And Mortality In The US, 2007–15
Kozhimannil, K. B., Interrante, J. D., Henning-Smith, C., & Admon, L. K. (2019) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00805 · Cited by 282
nature of the rural-urban mortality gap
Thomas, K. L., Dobis, E. A., McGranahan, D. A., & United States. Department of Agriculture. Economic Research Service (2024) · doi:10.32747/2024/8321813.ers · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Cosby, A. G., McDoom-Echebiri, M. M., James, W., Khandekar, H., Brown, W., & Hanna, H. L.
- Venue
- American Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- American Public Health Association
- Published
- 2019-01
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 155-162
- ISSN
- 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0048
- OpenAlex
- W2902824500
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 21.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Growth and Persistence of Place-Based Mortality in the United States: The Rural Mortality Penalty. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2105/ajph.2018.304787
- The paper
- Cosby, A. G., McDoom-Echebiri, M. M., James, W., Khandekar, H., Brown, W., & Hanna, H. L. (2019). Growth and Persistence of Place-Based Mortality in the United States: The Rural Mortality Penalty. American Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2018.304787
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.