Cited by 123Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsClinical practice guidelines implementationMethodologies in Health Research and Practice

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

New Standards for Systematic Reviews Incorporate Population Health Sciences

Open access
Nasser, Mona·2020·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

New Standards for Systematic Reviews Incorporate Population Health Sciences Mona Nasser DDS, MSc, PhD Affiliation Mona Nasser is with the Dental School of the Faculty of Health: Medicine, Dentistry and Human Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.CopyRightCorrespondence should be sent to Mona Nasser, Associate Professor in Evidence based Dentistry, Dental School, University of Plymouth—The John Bull Building, Research Way, Plymouth, Devon, PL6 8BU, UK (e-mail: mona.nasser@plymouth.ac.uk). Reprints can be ordered at http://www.ajph.org by clicking the “Reprints” link. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.305609 Accepted: January 27, 2020 Published Online: May 06, 2020

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.2020.305609

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Nasser, M.
Affiliations
University of Plymouth (GB)
Corresponding author
Nasser, Mona
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2020-06
Volume
110
Issue
6
Pages
753-754
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W3021090073
Cited by
123
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 5
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Methodologies in Health Research and Practice
Keywords
population health science, evidence-based dentistry, reporting guidelines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review