Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 13

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

West Oakland’s Experience in Building Community Power to Confront Environmental Injustice Through California’s Assembly Bill 617

MacIver, Lily, London, Jonathan, Sampson, Natalie, Gordon, Margaret, Grow, Richard, Eady, Veronica·2022·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

We explored how air quality management processes associated with Assembly Bill 617 (AB 617) in West Oakland, California, represent a shift in power relationships between government agencies and communities toward the goal of addressing legacies of environmental injustice. We drew from a statewide assessment of community engagement in AB 617’s first year, and an analysis of the West Oakland AB 617 process. The first comprised 2 statewide surveys (n = 102 and n = 106), 70 key informant interviews, observation of all AB 617 first-year sites, and analysis of related planning documents. The second comprised 2 rounds of interviews (n = 22 and n = 23, with a total of 19 individuals) and extensive participant observation. Several factors are necessary for pursuing environmental justice: (1) invest in community partnerships and collaborations, (2) honor community knowledge and data, (3) ensure that community constituents share power in environmental governance, and (4) adopt explicit racial justice frameworks. Although still a work in progress, AB 617 offers important lessons for community and policy organizations nationwide engaged in environmental justice. (Am J Public Health. 2022;112(2):262–270. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306592 )

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.2021.306592

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Cole LW, 2001, From the Ground Up: Environmental Racism and the Rise of the Environmental Justice Movement.
  2. 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00131.x · DOI
  3. Taylor D., 2014, Toxic Communities.
  4. 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300377 · DOI
  5. 10.1289/ehp.02110197 · DOI
  6. 10.2105/AJPH.92.1.24 · DOI
  7. 10.3390/ijerph14020117 · DOI
  8. 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1285 · DOI
  9. 10.1007/s40572-020-00263-8 · DOI
  10. Pellow DN., 2018, What Is Critical Environmental Justice?
  11. 10.4159/harvard.9780674061194 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1177/0309132516646495 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305656 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/j.healthplace.2016.04.014 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/S2542-5196(19)30241-4 · DOI
  16. 10.1089/env.2008.0506 · DOI
  17. 10.1177/0956247808096128 · DOI
  18. Self R., 2005, American Babylon: Race and the Struggle for Postwar Oakland.
  19. 10.1186/s12940-018-0382-1 · DOI
  20. Minkler M, 2011, Community-Based Participatory Research for Health: From Process to Outcomes.
  21. 10.2105/AJPH.2010.196204 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
MacIver, L., London, J., Sampson, N., Gordon, M., Grow, R., & Eady, V.
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2022-02
Volume
112
Issue
2
Pages
262-270
ISSN
  • 0090-0036
  • 1541-0048
Cited by
13
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.