CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1History of Science and MedicineMedical History and InnovationsNeurology and Historical Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

NAISSANCE ET DEVIATION DE LA THEORIE CELLULAIRE DANS L'OEVRE DE THEODORE SCHWANN

Open access
·1961·American Journal of Public Health and the Nations Health
DOI 10.2105/ajph.51.7.1084-aPMC PMC1522389
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.51.7.1084-a

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pasteur paid tribute to Theodor Schwann in a letter written in 1878.

    “There is another scholar to whom Pasteur paid tribute by writing him in 1878”

    From Louis Pasteur: Between Myth and Reality (2022) · cites this paper as [10]

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Venue
American Journal of Public Health and the Nations Health
Publisher
American Public Health Association
Published
1961-07
Volume
51
Issue
7
Pages
1084-1084
ISSN
0002-9572 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.2105/ajph.51.7.1084-a
PMC
PMC1522389
OpenAlex
W4244809665
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health and the Nations Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › History of Science and Medicine
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Medical History and Innovations
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurology and Historical Studies
Keywords
Theodor Schwann, cell theory, history of cell theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review