The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Communication, compliance, and concordance between physicians and patients with prescribed medications.
Abstract
Forty-six practicing physicians and 357 patients with diabetes mellitus or congestive heart failure were the subjects for this study, which focuses on the impact of medication regimen and doctor-patient communication in affecting patient medication-taking behavior and physician awareness of these behaviors. Four types of medication errors were defined: omissions, commissions, scheduling misconceptions and scheduling non-compliance. The average error rates were 19 per cent, 19 per cent, 17 per cent and 3 per cent, respectively. The combined average error was 58 per cent; scheduline non-compliance on the part of the patient was a minor component. Specific aspects of the medication regimen were associated with increased errors: (1) the more drugs involved between the doctor-patient pair, the greater the errors of omission and commission; and (2) the greater the complexity of the scheduling, the greater the errors of commission and scheduling misconceptions. If the patient did not know the function of all his drugs, errors of commission and scheduling misconception increased. Neither characteristics of patients nor the severity of disease were influential in determining the extent of medication errors. For patients with congestive heart failure, good communication of instructions and information from physician to patient was associated with low levels of all types of errors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Social support and patient adherence to medical treatment: a meta-analysis.
DiMatteo, M. R. (2004) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.23.2.207 · Cited by 2,107
Patient satisfaction: What we know about and what we still need to explore
Aharony, L., & Strasser, S. (1993) · Medical Care Review · doi:10.1177/002570879305000104 · Cited by 614
Measurement, Correlates, and Health Outcomes of Medication Adherence Among Seniors
Vik, S. A., Maxwell, C. J., & Hogan, D. B. (2004) · Annals of Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1345/aph.1d252 · Cited by 403
What is a successful doctor-patient interview? a study of interactions and outcomes
Stewart, M. A. (1984) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(84)90284-3 · Cited by 401
Physician communication when prescribing new medications
Tarn, D. M., Heritage, J., Paterniti, D. A., Hays, R. D., Kravitz, R. L., & Wenger, N. S. (2006) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.166.17.1855 · Cited by 400
Metadata
- Authors
- Hulka, B. S., Cassel, J. C., Kupper, L. L., & Burdette, J. A.
- Venue
- American Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- American Public Health Association
- Published
- 1976-09
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 847-853
- ISSN
- 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0048
- OpenAlex
- W1974245867
- Cited by
- 438
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Communication, compliance, and concordance between physicians and patients with prescribed medications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2105/ajph.66.9.847
- The paper
- Hulka, B. S., Cassel, J. C., Kupper, L. L., & Burdette, J. A. (1976). Communication, compliance, and concordance between physicians and patients with prescribed medications. American Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.66.9.847
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.