The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A comparative evaluation of a restrictive smoking policy in a general hospital.
Open accessAbstract
The impact of a restrictive smoking policy on the behavior and attitudes of smokers and non-smokers was assessed by surveying random cross-sectional samples of hospital employees before, six months after and 12 months after the policy was implemented, and comparing responses with those of employees of a hospital with no restrictive policy. Effectiveness of policy implementation was also evaluated. Results indicated that the policy was well-publicized and was approved by virtually all the non-smokers and the majority of the smokers. Following implementation, employees in the smoking policy hospital were less likely to report being bothered by smoke at their work stations than were employees of the comparison hospital. Six months and one year after the policy change, smokers reported lower smoking rates while at work, although quit smoking rates and home smoking rates were similar in both hospitals.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, laws restricting smoking can enhance smoking cessation outcomes [23].”
From A Behavior Change Model for Internet Interventions (2009) · cites this paper as [23]
Citations
Cites
Nicotine's role in smoking: An analysis of nicotine regulation.
McMorrow, M. J., & Foxx, R. M. (1983) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.93.2.302 · Cited by 118
Evaluation of smoking prohibition policy in a health maintenance organization.
Rosenstock, I. M., Stergachis, A. S., & Heaney, C. D. (1986) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.76.8.1014 · Cited by 89
Reducing smoking in the hospital. An effective model program.
Andrews, J. L. (1983) · CHEST Journal · doi:10.1378/chest.84.2.206 · Cited by 56
Petersen, L. R., Helgerson, S. D., Gibbons, C., Calhoun, C. R., Ciacco, K. H., & Pitchford, K. C. (1988) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 54
Fielding, J. E. (1986) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.76.8.957 · Cited by 21
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Petersen LR, 1988, Public Health Rep, 103, 115
- Rigotti NA, 1986, Clin Res, 34, 883A
- Fleiss JL: Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. New York: Wiley, 1981.
- Abrams DB, Wilson GT: Habit disorders: Alcohol and tobacco dependence. In: Frances AJ, Hales RD (eds): American Psychiatric Association Annual Review, 5. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, 1986.
- Abrams DB, Elder JP, Carleton R, etal: A comprehensive framework for conceptualizing and planning organizational health promotion programs. In: Cataldo M, Coates T (eds): Behavioral Medicine in Industry. New York: John Wiley, 1986.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Behavior Change Model for Internet Interventions
Ritterband, L. M., Thorndike, F. P., Cox, D. J., Kovatchev, B. P., & Gonder-Frederick, L. A. (2009) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-009-9133-4 · Cited by 591
Hopkins, D. P., Briss, P. A., Ricard, C. J., Husten, C. G., Carande-Kulis, V. G., Fielding, J. E., Alao, M. O., McKenna, J. W., Sharp, D. J., Harris, J. R., et al. (2001) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0749-3797(00)00297-x · Cited by 453
Ståhl, T., Rütten, A., Nutbeam, D., Bauman, A. E., Kannas, L. K., Abel, T., Lüschen, G. H. S. G. R. F., Rodriquez, D. J. A., Vinck, J., & van der Zee, J. (2001) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00116-7 · Cited by 358
Smoking cessation: What have we learned over the past decade?
Lichtenstein, E., & Glasgow, R. E. (1992) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.60.4.518 · Cited by 332
Prochaska, J. O., Velicer, W. F., Fava, J. L., Rossi, J. S., & Tsoh, J. Y. (2001) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/s0306-4603(00)00151-9 · Cited by 307
Metadata
- Authors
- Biener, L., Abrams, D. B., Follick, M. J., & Dean, L.
- Affiliations
- Brown University (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- American Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- American Public Health Association
- Published
- 1989-02
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 192-195
- ISSN
- 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0048
- PMC
- PMC1349932
- OpenAlex
- W2084996080
- Cited by
- 108
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2019: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 10.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (CA-38309)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Public Health Policies and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
- Keywords
- smoking policy, workplace smoking, hospital staff, smoking behavior, non-smokers, policy effectiveness, policy implementation, passive smoking, smoking cessation
- MeSH terms
- Smoking Prevention, Adult, Attitude, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Female, Hospitals, General, Humans, Male, Personnel, Hospital, Smoking, Health Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
