Cited by 453Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention

Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to reduce tobacco use and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke11The names and affiliations of the Task Force members are listed in the front of this supplement and at www.thecommunityguide.org.

Hopkins, David P, Briss, Peter A, Ricard, Connie J, Husten, Corinne G, Carande-Kulis, Vilma G, Fielding, Jonathan E, Alao, Mary O, McKenna, Jeffrey W +4 more·2001·American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Abstract

This report presents the results of systematic reviews of effectiveness, applicability, other effects, economic evaluations, and barriers to use of selected population-based interventions intended to reduce tobacco use and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. The related systematic reviews are linked by a common conceptual approach. These reviews form the basis of recommendations by the Task Force on Community Preventive Services (TFCPS) regarding the use of these selected interventions. The TFCPS recommendations are presented on page 67 of this supplement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0749-3797(00)00297-x

Cites

442 of 442 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several authors have suggested that translation of research findings into real-world interventions could be hastened by a strategy that builds translation potential into initial treatment evaluation.

    “Several authors (e.g., (3, 40–43)) have suggested that the process of translating research findings into real-world interventions could be hastened through the use of a strategy that builds translation potential into initial treatment evaluation.”
  • According to these authors, successful translation of smoking cessation interventions depends on three criteria: ease of delivery, effectiveness in real-world settings, and compatibility and integration with real-world delivery systems.

    “According to these authors successful translation of smoking cessation interventions depends upon three criteria: (a) ease of delivery; (b) effectiveness in real-world settings; and (c) compatibility and integration with real-world delivery systems.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hopkins, D. P., Briss, P. A., Ricard, C. J., Husten, C. G., Carande-Kulis, V. G., Fielding, J. E., Alao, M. O., McKenna, J. W., Sharp, D. J., Harris, J. R., Woollery, T. A., & Harris, K. W.
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Hopkins, David P
Venue
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-02
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
16-66
ISSN
0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2171599218
Cited by
453
References
442
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 30
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
Keywords
tobacco use reduction, environmental tobacco smoke, passive smoking, population-level interventions, intervention effectiveness, applicability, economic evaluation, implementation barriers, community preventive services, evidence-based recommendations
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Community Health Services, Humans, Preventive Health Services, Tobacco Smoke Pollution, United States, Smoking Cessation, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review