The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Overcoming the absence of socioeconomic data in medical records: validation and application of a census-based methodology.
Abstract
BACKGROUND. Most US medical records lack socioeconomic data, hindering studies of social gradients in health and ascertainment of whether study samples are representative of the general population. This study assessed the validity of a census-based approach in addressing these problems. METHODS. Socioeconomic data from 1980 census tracts and block groups were matched to the 1985 membership records of a large prepaid health plan (n = 1.9 million), with the link provided by each individual's residential address. Among a subset of 14,420 Black and White members, comparisons were made of the association of individual, census tract, and census block-group socioeconomic measures with hypertension, height, smoking, and reproductive history. RESULTS. Census-level and individual-level socioeconomic measures were similarly associated with the selected health outcomes. Census data permitted assessing response bias due to missing individual-level socioeconomic data and also contextual effects involving the interaction of individual- and neighborhood-level socioeconomic traits. On the basis of block-group characteristics, health plan members generally were representative of the total population; persons in impoverished neighborhoods, however, were underrepresented. CONCLUSIONS. This census-based methodology offers a valid and useful approach to overcoming the absence of socioeconomic data in most US medical records.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sick individuals and sick populations
Rose, G. (2001) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/30.3.427 · Cited by 3,736
Sick individuals and sick populations
ROSE, G. (1985) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/14.1.32 · Cited by 2,701
Cited by
Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death
Corley, D. A., Jensen, C. D., Marks, A. R., Zhao, W. K., Lee, J. K., Doubeni, C. A., Zauber, A. G., de Boer, J., Fireman, B. H., Schottinger, J. E., et al. (2014) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1309086 · Cited by 2,270
Benza, R. L., Miller, D. P., Gomberg-Maitland, M., Frantz, R. P., Foreman, A. J., Coffey, C. S., Frost, A., Barst, R. J., Badesch, D. B., Elliott, C. G., et al. (2010) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.109.898122 · Cited by 1,547
Epidemiology and the web of causation: has anyone seen the spider?
Krieger, N. (1994) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(94)90202-x · Cited by 1,419
Self-citationBody Mass Index and Risk for End-Stage Renal Disease
Hsu, C.-Y., McCulloch, C. E., Iribarren, C., Darbinian, J., & Go, A. S. (2006) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-144-1-200601030-00006 · Cited by 1,390
Bringing context back into epidemiology: variables and fallacies in multilevel analysis
Diez-Roux, A. V. (1998) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.88.2.216 · Cited by 1,317
Metadata
- Authors
- Krieger, N.
- Venue
- American Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- American Public Health Association
- Published
- 1992-05
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 703-710
- ISSN
- 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0048
- OpenAlex
- W2155532314
- Cited by
- 1,654
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 23.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Overcoming the absence of socioeconomic data in medical records: validation and application of a census-based methodology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2105/ajph.82.5.703
- The paper
- Krieger, N. (1992). Overcoming the absence of socioeconomic data in medical records: validation and application of a census-based methodology. American Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.82.5.703
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.