The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Decisions near the end of life: professional views on life-sustaining treatments.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES. How do health care professionals assess the care of hospital patients near the end of life? Are physicians and nurses aware of and in agreement with national recommendations regarding patients' rights to forgo life-sustaining medical treatments and to receive adequate pain control? METHODS. We surveyed 687 physicians and 759 nurses in 5 hospitals. RESULTS. Almost half (47%) of all respondents and fully 70% of the house officers reported that they had acted against their conscience in providing care to the terminally ill. Four times as many respondents were concerned about the provision of overly burdensome treatment than about undertreatment. CONCLUSIONS. In summary, many physicians and nurses were disturbed by the degree to which technological solutions influence care during the final days of a terminal illness and by the undertreatment of pain. However, changes in the care of dying patients may not have kept pace with national recommendations, in part because many physicians and nurses disagreed with and may have been unaware of some key guidelines, such as the permissibility of withdrawing treatments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Do House Officers Learn From Their Mistakes?
Wu, A. W. (1991) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1991.03460160067031 · Cited by 565
Cited by
Quality End-of-Life Care: Patients' Perspectives
Singer, P. A., Martin, D. K., & Kelner, M. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.281.2.163 · Cited by 1,287
Quill, T. E. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.284.19.2502 · Cited by 414
Relationship between ICU nurses’ moral distress with burnout and anticipated turnover
Shoorideh, F. A., Ashktorab, T., Yaghmaei, F., & Alavi Majd, H. (2015) · Nursing Ethics · doi:10.1177/0969733014534874 · Cited by 212
Seven Legal Barriers to End-of-Life Care<SUBTITLE>Myths, Realities, and Grains of Truth</SUBTITLE>
Meisel, A. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.284.19.2495 · Cited by 192
The need for end-of-life care training in nephrology: national survey results of nephrology fellows
Holley, J. L., Carmody, S. S., Moss, A. H., Sullivan, A. M., Cohen, L. M., Block, S. D., & Arnold, R. M. (2003) · American Journal of Kidney Diseases · doi:10.1016/s0272-6386(03)00868-0 · Cited by 165
Metadata
- Authors
- Solomon, M. Z., O'Donnell, L., Jennings, B., Guilfoy, V, Wolf, S. M., Nolan, K., Jackson, R., Koch-Weser, D., & Donnelley, S.
- Venue
- American Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- American Public Health Association
- Published
- 1993-01
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 14-23
- ISSN
- 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0048
- OpenAlex
- W2039321214
- Cited by
- 582
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 53.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Decisions near the end of life: professional views on life-sustaining treatments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2105/ajph.83.1.14
- The paper
- Solomon, M. Z., O'Donnell, L., Jennings, B., Guilfoy, V, Wolf, S. M., Nolan, K., Jackson, R., Koch-Weser, D., & Donnelley, S. (1993). Decisions near the end of life: professional views on life-sustaining treatments. American Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.83.1.14
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.