The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dietary intake among Mexican-American women: generational differences and a comparison with white non-Hispanic women.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES. Although Mexican Americans consume diets that may protect them against adverse health, dietary advantages may disappear with increased acculturation. This study examined whether the nutrient intake of second-generation Mexican-American women of childbearing age deteriorates compared with that of first-generation Mexican-American women and approximates that of White non-Hispanic women. METHODS. Data on the absolute and relative intake of eight nutrients were obtained from a 24-hour recall and compared among 475 first-generation and 898 second-generation Mexican-American women, and among 2326 White non-Hispanic women. RESULTS. Although first-generation Mexican-American women were of lower socioeconomic status than were second-generation or White non-Hispanic women, they had a higher average intake of protein; vitamins A, C, and folic acid; and calcium than the other two groups. Whereas the mean adequacy ratio of the eight nutrients studied was highest in first-generation Mexican women, it was lowest in their second-generation counterparts. CONCLUSIONS. First-generation Mexican women stand a markedly lower risk of eating a poor diet than second-generation Mexican women, whose nutrient intake resembles that of White non-Hispanic women.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lara, M., Gamboa, C., Kahramanian, M. I., Morales, L. S., & Hayes Bautista, D. E. (2005) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.26.021304.144615 · Cited by 1,513
Ayala, G. X., Baquero, B., & Klinger, S. (2008) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/j.jada.2008.05.009 · Cited by 555
Diet and Exercise Among Adults With Type 2 Diabetes
Nelson, K. M., Reiber, G., & Boyko, E. J. (2002) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.25.10.1722 · Cited by 442
Rodriguez, C. J., Allison, M., Daviglus, M. L., Isasi, C. R., Keller, C., Leira, E. C., Palaniappan, L., Piña, I. L., Ramirez, S. M., Rodriguez, B., et al. (2014) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000071 · Cited by 426
Thomson, M. D., & Hoffman-Goetz, L. (2009) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.05.011 · Cited by 414
Metadata
- Authors
- Guendelman, S., & Abrams, B.
- Venue
- American Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- American Public Health Association
- Published
- 1995-01
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 20-25
- ISSN
- 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0048
- OpenAlex
- W2107016565
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dietary intake among Mexican-American women: generational differences and a comparison with white non-Hispanic women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2105/ajph.85.1.20
- The paper
- Guendelman, S., & Abrams, B. (1995). Dietary intake among Mexican-American women: generational differences and a comparison with white non-Hispanic women. American Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.85.1.20
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.