Cited by 1,513Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchLatin American and Latino StudiesMigration, Health and Trauma

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 166 of the 166 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ACCULTURATION AND LATINO HEALTH IN THE UNITED STATES: A Review of the Literature and its Sociopolitical Context

Open access
Lara, Marielena, Gamboa, Cristina, Kahramanian, M. Iya, Morales, Leo S., Hayes Bautista, David E.·2005·Annual Review of Public Health

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of the concept of acculturation and reviews existing evidence about the possible relationships between acculturation and selected health and behavioral outcomes among Latinos. The effect of acculturation on Latino health is complex and not well understood. In certain areas-substance abuse, dietary practices, and birth outcomes-there is evidence that acculturation has a negative effect and that it is associated with worse health outcomes, behaviors, or perceptions. In others-health care use and self-perceptions of health-the effect is mostly in the positive direction. Although the literature, to date, on acculturation lacks some breadth and methodological rigor, the public health significance of findings in areas in which there is enough evidence justifies public health action. We conclude with a set of general recommendations in two areas-public health practice and research-targeted to public health personnel in academia, community-based settings, and government agencies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.26.021304.144615

Cites

166 of 166 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Arias E, 2003, Natl. Vital Stat. Rep., 52, 1
  2. Balcazar H, 1999, Ethn. Dis., 9, 410
  3. Byrd TL, 2001, Ethn. Dis, 11, 72
  4. Cantero PJ, 1999, Ethn. Dis., 9, 166
  5. Coonrod DV, 1995, Ethn. Dis., 9, 434
  6. Coonrod DV, 2004, J. Reprod. Med., 49, 17
  7. 10.1001/jama.1991.03460020102037 · DOI
  8. Cuellar I, 1980, Hisp. J. Behav. Sci., 2, 199
  9. Dusenbery L, 1994, Public Health Rep, 109, 421
  10. English PB, 1997, Ethn. Dis., 7, 229
  11. Harris-Reid MA, 1999, Humanit. Soc. Sci, 59, 3975
  12. Hu DJ, 1986, West. J. Med, 144, 490
  13. Kerner JF, 1998, Ethn. Dis., 8, 167
  14. 10.1177/000312240006500605 · DOI
  15. Lara M, 2004, Pediatrics
  16. Markides KS, 1993, Ethn. Dis., 3, 70
  17. Mendoza FS, 1994, Crit. Health Issues Child Youth, 4, 43
  18. Mendoza FS, 2000, Child Health in the Multicutural Environment, 5
  19. Otero-Sabogal R, 1995, J. Natl. Cancer Inst. Monogr., 18, 73
  20. Samat JM, 1992, Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev, 1, 235
  21. U.S. Dep. Health Hum. Serv., Off. Minor. Health, 2001, National Standards for Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Services in Health Care: Final Rep
  22. 10.2105/AJPH.84.11.1825 · DOI
  23. Wells KB, 1989, Health Serv. Res, 24, 237
  24. Wolff CB, 1996, Health Care Women Int, 17, 563

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lara, M., Gamboa, C., Kahramanian, M. I., Morales, L. S., & Hayes Bautista, D. E.
Affiliations
  • RAND Corporation (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Department of Pediatrics, 3Center for Study of Latino Health and Culture, 4Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, 90024;, , ,
Venue
Annual Review of Public Health
Published
2005-04-21
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
367-397
ISSN
  • 0163-7525 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2093
OpenAlex
W2119537576
Cited by
1,513
References
166
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 100 · 2018: 81 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 110 · 2015: 90 · 2014: 87 · 2013: 97 · 2012: 108
FWCI
29.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (5p20md000148-05)
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (K08 HS00008, K08 HS000008)
  • National Institute on Aging (P30AG021684)
  • National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (P20-MD000148)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Latin American and Latino Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
Keywords
acculturation, Latino health, health disparities, substance abuse, dietary habits, birth outcomes, health care utilization, health perception, sociopolitical context, Latino immigrants
MeSH terms
Acculturation, Attitude to Health, Chronic Disease, Cultural Characteristics, Emigration and Immigration, Feeding Behavior, Health Services Accessibility, Health Status, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Life Style, Mental Health, Models, Psychological, Mortality, Politics, Public Health, Research, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Health Behavior, Reproductive Medicine, Needs Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review