The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Psychosocial work environment and sickness absence among British civil servants: the Whitehall II study.
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES. This study sought to examine the association between the psychosocial work environment and subsequent rates of sickness absence. METHODS. The analyses were based on a cohort of male and female British civil servants (n=9072). Rates of short spells (<or=7 days) and long spells (>7 days) of sickness absence were calculated for different aspects of the psychosocial work environment, as measured by self-reports and personnel managers' ratings (external assessments). RESULTS. Low levels of work demands, control, and support were associated with higher rates of short and long spells of absence in men and, to a lesser extent, in women. The differences were similar for the self-reports and external assessments. After adjustment for grade of employment, the differences were diminished but generally remained significant for short spells. The combination of high demands and low control was only associated with higher rates of short spells in the lower grades. CONCLUSIONS. The psychosocial work environment predicts rates of sickness absence. Increased levels of control and support at work could have beneficial effects in terms of both improving the health and well-being of employees and increasing productivity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: Implications for Job Redesign
Karasek, R. A. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392498 · Cited by 12,597
Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0076546 · Cited by 7,246
Employee reactions to job characteristics.
Hackman, J. R., & Lawler, E. E. (1971) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0031152 · Cited by 2,442
COOPER, C. L., & MARSHALL, J. (1976) · Journal of Occupational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1976.tb00325.x · Cited by 1,201
Spector, P. E., & Jex, S. M. (1991) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.76.1.46 · Cited by 316
Cited by
Marmot, M., Bosma, H., Hemingway, H., Brunner, E., & Stansfeld, S. (1997) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(97)04244-x · Cited by 1,291
Self-citationTwo alternative job stress models and the risk of coronary heart disease.
Bosma, H., Peter, R., Siegrist, J., & Marmot, M. (1998) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.88.1.68 · Cited by 831
Self-citationWork characteristics predict psychiatric disorder: prospective results from the Whitehall II Study.
Stansfeld, S. A., Fuhrer, R., Shipley, M. J., & Marmot, M. G. (1999) · Occupational and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1136/oem.56.5.302 · Cited by 800
Self-citationSleep disturbances, work stress and work hours
Åkerstedt, T., Knutsson, A., Westerholm, P., Theorell, T., Alfredsson, L., & Kecklund, G. (2002) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/s0022-3999(02)00333-1 · Cited by 716
Butterworth, P., Leach, L. S., Strazdins, L., Olesen, S. C., Rodgers, B., & Broom, D. H. (2011) · Occupational and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1136/oem.2010.059030 · Cited by 333
Metadata
- Authors
- North, F. M., Syme, S. L., Feeney, A., Shipley, M., & Marmot, M.
- Venue
- American Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- American Public Health Association
- Published
- 1996-03
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 332-340
- ISSN
- 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0048
- OpenAlex
- W2045298450
- Cited by
- 417
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 37.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.